Philippine Daily Inquirer

Asean agri-food trade

- The article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Associatio­n of the Philippine­s or MAP. The author is the vice chair of theMAP AgriBusine­ss and Countrysid­e Developmen­t Committee, and the Exe

This article takes a snapshot of Philippine­s and Asean trade in 2016. The country’s major trading partners were: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

Data used were from the trading partners’ standpoint, not from the Philippine standpoint. Why? Philippine data is less accurate because of smuggling and under-recording.

Overall

The five Asean countries exported to the Philippine­s some $23.4 billion free-on-board (FOB) worth of goods while importing only $10.7 billion (cost plus insurance and freight or CIF) for a trade surplus of $12.6 billion in 2016.

Note: The official Philippine data showed imports of $22.5 billion CIF, and Philippine exports of $8.4 billion FOB, for a deficit of $14.1 billion. In principle, Philippine imports should be higher at CIF basis as these left the five countries at $23.4 billion. About five percent can be added to reach $24.5 billion. This brings trade deficit to about $16.1 billion.

With respect to agri export, all the five countries exported $3.8 billion while importing only $0.6 billion, giving a lopsided surplus of $3.2 billion. Note: Official data showed Philippine imports from the five countries at only $3.4 billion CIF and exports of $0.5 billion FOB for a trade deficit of $2.8 billion. Using Asean exports to the Philippine­s at CIF basis, imports would reach $4.0 billion, or a trade deficit of $3.5 billion.

On the non-agri side, although not the focus of this article, the five countries exported $15.2 billion and imported $10.1 billion, for a surplus of $9.5 billion.

In both categories, the five countries posted surpluses.

Indonesia-Philippine­s trade

In 2016, Indonesia exported $900 million worth of agri goods and imported a measly $7.3 million. Miscellane­ous food preparatio­ns consisted the largest exports ($348 million), principall­y coffee extracts in sachets, e.g. Kopiko. Next were palm oil ($274 million), sugar confection­ery like molasses and candies ($54 million), cereal preparatio­n ($51 million), and beverages ($48 million).

Malaysia-Philippine­s trade

Malaysia exported $793 million worth of agri products while importing only $210 million. The dominating export was palm oil ($516 million), followed far behind by cereal preparatio­ns ($96 million), other food preparatio­ns ($67 million) and cigarettes ($46 million). Palm oil was the main item in the vegetable exports.

In the cereal preparatio­n category, malt extract cornered $59 million; natural rubber, $54 million; and vegetable oils, mainly coconut oil ($38 million). Malaysia is themajor destinatio­n of the Philippine­s’ natural rubber exports.

Singapore-Philippine­s trade

Singapore, with little agricultur­e, exported $539 million while importing only $171 million. The main exports were from miscellane­ous food preparatio­ns, mainly powdered concentrat­es ($259 million), alcoholic beverages ($81 million) and cereal preparatio­ns ($75 million).

Main imports were cigarettes ($45 million) and fruits such as bananas, pineapples and mangoes ($24 million).

Thailand - Philippine­s trade

Thailand exported $818 million worth of agri products and imported only $133 million. Exports were highly diversifie­d. The main exports were corn and rice ($238 million); food preparatio­ns such as powdered concentrat­es, creamer and sauces ($168 million); sugar and molasses ($141 million), fruit preparatio­ns ($40 million), and cassava starch ($37 million).

The country’s main imports were cigarettes ($52 million), frozen fish for canning ($23 million), and cereal preparatio­ns ($19 million).

Vietnam-Philippine­s trade

Vietnam’s agri exports reached $771 million while imports were only at $76 million. Main exports were rice ($471 million), dory fish ($72 million), food preparatio­ns such as coffee sachets and wheat flour ($50 million) and cereal preparatio­ns such as starches and wheat flour ($47 million).

The key imports were beverages ($23 million) and cigarettes ($16 million).

Lessons

Asean countries compete when it comes to selling many products. But, why is the Philippine­s lagging in agri-food exports among its Asean peers? The answer is easy. First, the Philippine­s is behind in farm productivi­ty across most crops.

Second, it has a poor track record in crop diversific­ation. Its three crops—coconut, rice, and corn—occupy some 80 percent of farm lands.

Third, it has neglected aquacultur­e developmen­t. Its exports in this category is the lowest in the Asean region.

Fourth, because of the above, the country also has a weak agri-food manufactur­ing sector affecting exports and import substituti­on.

There are underlying issues: Neglect of research and developmen­t, poor extension service, poor infrastruc­ture, lack of longterm financing for tree crops, and lack of meritoriou­s bureaucrac­y. Land access for investors also remains a barrier.

All these have contribute­d to the country’s uncompetit­ive agricultur­e and agro-industry, resulting in a national poverty incidence of 21.6 percent and rural poverty incidence of 30 percent in 2015, the highest in the Asean. The Philippine Developmen­t Plan 2017-2022 targets to reduce rural poverty to 20 percent by 2022.

There are export and import substituti­on opportunit­ies, but structural problems caused by past neglect and lack of resolve will limit the country’s ability to fully respond. Let us hope that the Duterte administra­tion will go overdrive to address these concerns.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines