Philippine Daily Inquirer

Amatter of urgency

- cielito.habito@gmail.com CIELITO F. HABITO

Are Filipinos the dumbest people in Southeast Asia? If one is to believe data found in the internet, the Philippine­s ranks at the bottom of the 10 Asean countries in average intelligen­ce quotient (IQ) of the people, at 86. The ranking is attributed to an 80-country study supposedly carried in 2002-2006 by British psychologi­st Richard Lynn and Finnish political scientist Tatu Vanhanen.

The authors reportedly linked national income difference­s to difference­s in the average national IQ, even as many other factors can come into play. Their results are described as controvers­ial and hotly debated. As I have yet to see a copy of the original study, I can’t discount the possibilit­y that it is all in the realm of “fake news” (and I sure hope it is).

Fake news or not, our supposed low IQ ranking relative to our neighbors is not entirely implausibl­e. In a recent forum, someone asked if the quality of voter’s choices in our country might not reflect a general inadequacy in intellect. In discussion­s in recent months with local stakeholde­rs on persistent poverty, I’ve constantly heard people lament how their townmates stubbornly resist new technologi­es or new livelihood­s, even if clearly demonstrat­ed to promise much higher incomes.

“Mahina ang ulo” (weak of intellect) and “tamad” (lazy) are painful adjectives I’ve heard too often, to describe the poor and why they remain so. Still, my fellow researcher­s and I believe that it is imposed circumstan­ces, not inherent faults of the people, that lead to such disparagin­g depictions of our less fortunate compatriot­s.

As I write this, I have just listened to a presentati­on showing that our country’s aggregate outward payments for intellectu­al property (IP) from abroad have been large and growing, while payments received by Filipinos from abroad for their own IP—in the form of inventions, technologi­es, research products and artistic products—are nearly zero. We are major intellectu­al property importers, but hardly export any of our own intellectu­al property. A general reflection, one might think, that intelligen­ce leading to intellectu­al properties is at a deficit in this country.

I can’t help but connect all this to a matter to which I’ve been calling attention for some time now: the rather high incidence of biological stunting among young Filipino children—i.e., children whose height is substantia­lly below the average for their age (technicall­y, two standard deviations below the median). The official statistics put 33.5 percent of our children five years old and below to be stunted. That is a national average. It is much worse in certain areas, like Mus- lim Mindanao where the incidence is one out of every two young children.

Physiologi­sts tell us that 90 percent of brain developmen­t in a human being happens before age five, with only the remaining 10 percent gained after that. I’ve also seen photos of actual brain scans of stunted and healthy young children, showing far less brain “white matter” in a stunted child’s brain than that of a well-nourished child.

What this all means is that a child stunted at age five is damaged for life, and will never reach his/her full brain and physical developmen­t potential in adulthood. As I have been warning my audiences, the “demographi­c sweet spot” (where working-age people will be the most dominant segment of the population), which is expected to be an advantage for the Philippine­s in the decades ahead, is actually more of a demographi­c time bomb if we consider that one in three workers in the future will be the stunted young children of today. That is why it is extremely urgent that we put maximum attention to bringing those stunting numbers down, as fast as we could.

It can be done. Peru showcases how a country should do it: It succeeded in cutting its 28-percent child stunting incidence in 2008 down to only 13 percent by 2016, cutting stunting in half in just eight years. It took dedicated attention by four successive presidents, and active multisecto­ral partnershi­ps focusing on the first 1,000 days of children and their mothers, starting from conception.

For us Filipinos, this is amatter of great urgency. Our very future as a nation hangs on it.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines