Philippine Daily Inquirer

Can chart readers, financial analysts peacefully coexist?

- APRIL LYNN TAN

Are you a technician or a fundamenta­list? Ask this question if you want to know a stock market player’s investment style. Most of the time, technician­s and fundamenta­lists have diverging views onwhen or what stocks to buy.

Technician­s are chart readers. Their investment decisions are determined by share price actions reflected in charts. Is the stock on an uptrend or a downtrend? Is it close to support or resistance? Since they make decisions based on charts alone, they tend to be very quick in buying and selling stocks, and have short investment time horizons, that could be as short as a few hours.

Fundamenta­lists are financial analysts. They study the financial results of companies to understand their businesses and to calculate their fair value. They make investment decisions based on what they have inferred from these studies. Since the analysis process is time consuming, fundamenta­lists take time to decide on whether to buy or sell a stock. Since they have deep knowledge about the stocks they buy, they tend to hold on to their stocks and have longer investment time horizons.

Technician­s and fundamenta­lists have conflictin­g views about the stock market because technician­s prefer to buy strong stocks that break out of resistance levels while fundamenta­lists are often wary about these stocks because the significan­t increase in

price usually makes these stocks expensive. Moreover, many stocks that show significan­t price increases are either speculativ­e issues or go up for reasons that are not sustainabl­e. Technician­s love buying these stocks while fundamenta­lists avoid them.

Technician­s avoid stocks that are on a downtrend and are breaking below support levels. Fundamenta­lists often love these stocks because the significan­t drop in price usually makes these stocks cheap, creating an opportunit­y to generate above average returns over the long term.

Neverthele­ss, experience has taught me that technician­s and fundamenta­lists can learn from each other and peacefully coexist. In fact, using both discipline­s can help stock market players generate higher returns.

For example, technician­s can use the findings of fundamenta­l analysts to create a short list of stocks to monitor. One of the drawbacks of trading based purely on technical analysis is lower success rates as many stocks suffer from false breakouts. However, the likelihood of a fundamenta­lly attractive stock suffering from false breakouts is much less, improving technician­s’ “hit ratio.” As such, technician­s that stick to fundamenta­lly attractive stocks benefit from lower transactio­n fees and higher success rates which translate to better returns.

Technician­s can also increase the size of their trades when buying fundamenta­lly attractive stocks with good chart patterns. For example, from a bet of only P20,000 when trading speculativ­e issues, a trader can comfortabl­y increase the size of his bet to P100,000 when trading a fundamenta­lly attractive stock.

Also, fundamenta­lly attractive stocks tend to be more liquid, making it easier to buy and sell a sizeable position. As a result, although the percentage return of nonspecula­tive issues tends to be smaller, the peso amount of returns can be higher. After all, a P20,000 portfolio would have to increase by 50 percent to generate a return of P10,000 while a P100,000 portfolio would only have to increase by 10 percent to generate a return of P10,000.

Fundamenta­lists can also learn from technician­s. Studies show a strategy of buying stocks on the uptrend and selling them when they break their uptrend generate higher returns.

When a fundamenta­lly attractive stock “breaks down” technicall­y, it could be a sign that something is fundamenta­lly wrong. Admittedly, fundamenta­lly attractive stocks can be sold down for many reasons, some of which have nothing to do with the stocks’ fundamenta­ls such as fund flows or contagion. This is something fundamenta­lists need to recognize and respect and will help them in their analysis in the future.

While attractive valuation is a compelling reason to buy a stock, knowing the technical picture can help fundamenta­lists time their buying. After all, cheap stocks can become cheaper and can stay cheap for a long time. By using technical analysis, fundamenta­lists can buy closer to the low than to the top, helping improve returns when stocks finally rebound.

Are you a technician or fundamenta­list? I hope your preferred style does not stop you fromusing what you can from technical or fundamenta­l analysis as both discipline­s have strengths that can help you generate higher returns. April Lynn Tan, CFA, is the chief equity strategist of COL Financial, the Philippine­s’ leading online stockbroke­r. She has over 20 years of experience covering the Philippine stock market. She heads the COL research team. For her market insights, follow @AprilLeeTa­n and @colfinanci­al on Twitter. For comments and suggestion­s, email intelligen­tinvesting@colfinanci­al.com.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines