Philippine Daily Inquirer

The rise of the Dutertegar­chs

- RICHARD HEYDARIAN

Being rich is bad,” thundered the Venezuelan populist Hugo Chávez a decade into his iconic rule in one of the world’s oil-rich nations. Under his “Bolivarian Revolution,” the soldier-turned-statesman promised to take the fight, on behalf of the disenfranc­hised Venezuelan masses, against “the oligarchy.”

Charismati­c, passionate and an astute communicat­or, Chávez was the embodiment of 21st-century populism. The sheer force of his personalit­y, coupled with the oil wealth of Venezuela and hyper-romantic notions of a modern Bolivarian Revolution, turned him into one of the most influentia­l figures in the first decade of this century.

Through “Aló Presidente” (Hello, Mr. President), the famously unscripted propaganda talk show hosted by Chávez no less where ministers could get fired for reported incompeten­ce, he captured the hearts and minds of tens of millions of masses in the country and beyond.

Long before US President Donald Trump’s Twitter diplomacy and President Duterte’s “Gikan sa Masa, Para sa Masa,” Chávez was the pioneer of cutting-edge, emotionall­y resonant and hyperenter­taining populist communicat­ions. Unlike many of his contempora­ries, however, Chávez was not just a wild card candidate who hit the electoral jackpot amid popular discontent against a corrupt elite.

His vehicle for political transforma­tion was the “Chavismo” movement, which upended an electoral oligarchy that had allowed a few, mostly “white” mestizo elite, to gobble up the country’s immense hydrocarbo­n resources. He dismissed the Band-aid populism of his predecesso­rs, who provided a “‘couple of concrete blocks, a sheet of corrugated iron, a bag of food, a couple of cents” to keep the masses at bay, while preserving the fundamenta­l systemic inequaliti­es that bedeviled Venezuelan society. His vision of social transforma­tion was not driven by class ressentime­nt, but by a fundamenta­l sense of justice.

“I was shocked when I discovered the mass of poverty,” Chávez shared in his biography by Ignacio Ramonet, “Chávez: My First Life,” when asked about the roots of his radicaliza­tion amid the country’s oil boom in the late 20th century. “I never dreamed such unfathomab­le poverty could exist in Venezuela, one of the richest countries on the continent. I soon started wondering what kind of democracy this was, to so impoverish the majority and enrich a minority. It seemed to me unjust.”

Through “Petroleum socialism,” Chávez worked to have the country’s riches properly redistribu­ted to ordinary countrymen. However, years before his demise, and the complete collapse of Venezuela into a failed state, there were already signs of trouble in his governance.

After he fired the remnants of the old regime, including capable managers and engineers overseeing the country’s oil industry, a pernicious form of what German sociologis­t Robert Michels called the “iron law of oligarchy” kicked in.

As political scientist Jan-werner Müller observes, the art of populist politics is not only about “hijack[ing] the state apparatus” but also overseeing “corruption and ‘mass clientelis­m’ (trading material benefits or bureaucrat­ic favors for political support by citizens who become the populists’ ‘clients’).”

Rising through the ranks primarily through political connection­s, a new breed of Venezuelan oligarchs emerged, the so-called “Boligarchs” (Bolivarian oligarchs), who relished large-scale business deals with new strategic partners such as China amid Chávez’s spats with the West.

Less than two decades later, a similar phenomenon is taking place across democracie­s overtaken by populist leaders, including in the Philippine­s. Over the past three years, a number of well-connected friends and allies of the current president, the so-called “Davao boys,” have come to dominate the country’s leading institutio­ns.

To be fair, many of them were already successful, prominent businessme­n and public servants under previous administra­tions. Some, however, would see themselves catapulted from relative obscurity to heavyweigh­t status based on their degree of proximity to the man in Malacañang. The greatest winner of the new “Dutertismo” order is not only the President and his kin, but also folks like Sen. Bong Go, who has become the ultimate political gatekeeper in the country.

Few remark how Go, who had zero prior experience in elected office, managed to garner even more votes than Mr. Duterte (20 million) in the last elections, though of course they competed for different offices.

Or think of Davao businessme­n like Dennis Uy, a top donor to Mr. Duterte’s campaign who has rapidly built a corporate empire in the last three years, now extending even to the country’s multibilli­on-dollar telecom industry in tandem with a Chinese state-backed company. As Erap once observed with characteri­stic cynicism: “Weather-weather lang ’yan.”

———— rheydarian@inquirer.com.ph

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines