Philippine Daily Inquirer

Neda Board OKS Naia rehab plan

P102-B proposal to double congested airport’s annual passenger capacity to 65M

- By Ben O. De Vera @bendeverai­nq

Further improvemen­ts at the Ninoy Aquino Internatio­nal Airport (Naia) are a step closer after the National Economic and Developmen­t Authority (Neda) Board on Friday greenlight­ed the unsolicite­d offer of seven tycoons to rehabilita­te the country’s main gateway tagged in the past as among the world’s worst airports.

Finance Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III confirmed the approval of the P102-billion proposal of the so-called Naia Consortium, which, in partnershi­p with a unit of Singapore’s Changi Airport Group, sought to modernize, expand and operate the country’s busiest airport under a 15-year concession period.

Naia Consortium groups Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Alliance Global Group Inc. of tycoon Andrew Tan, Asia Emerging Dragon of taipan Lucio Tan, Ayala Corp., Filinvest Developmen­t of the Gotianuns, JG Summit of the Gokongweis and Metro Pacific Investment­s Corp. of businessma­n Manuel V. Pangilinan.

The rehabilita­tion proposal included doubling Naia’s annual passenger design capacity to 65 million as well as jacking up aircraft movements to 52 an hour.

The unsolicite­d public-private partnershi­p (PPP) proposal would undergo a Swiss challenge—other companies can bid for the project and then the original proponent that submitted the unsolicite­d proposal will be allowed to match or submit a better bid before the project is awarded.

It took some time before the government approved the Naia rehabilita­tion project as the economic team wanted it to adopt the Clark Internatio­nal Airport operations and maintenanc­e (O&M) contract as a template.

Given congestion at Naia, the government allowed new airport proposals in Bulacan and Cavite on top of the Clark airport in Pampanga.

Just this month, the economic team included the rehabilita­tion of Naia among the Duterte administra­tion’s 100 flagship projects under the updated “Build, Build, Build” pipeline.

A number of big-ticket airport projects were also in the new “Build, Build, Build” list such as San Miguel Holdings Corp.’s P735.6-billion New Manila Internatio­nal Airport in Bulacan; Aboitiz Infracapit­al Inc.’s P25.5-billion upgrade, expansion and O&M of New Bohol (Panglao) Internatio­nal Airport; Mega 7 Constructi­on’s P3.8-billion O&M and facility upgrade of Kalibo Internatio­nal Airport; Chelsea Logistics Holdings Corp.’s P48.9-billion developmen­t and O&M of Davao Internatio­nal Airport, and Aboitiz Infracapit­al’s P45.8-billion upgrade, expansion and O&M of Laguinding­an Airport, among others.

All of these airport projects were unsolicite­d PPPS, showing the Duterte administra­tion’s openness to tap tycoons’ deep pockets to help build massive infrastruc­ture.

Socioecono­mic Planning Secretary and Neda chief Ernesto M. Pernia had said that the government would appraise unsolicite­d PPP projects “in accord with the overall infrastruc­ture plan, appropriat­eness and feasibilit­y.”

In the updated “Build, Build, Build,” unsolicite­d PPP projects in the transport and mobility sector amounted to a combined P1.39 trillion or nearly a third of the total project cost of the 100 “flagship” projects worth at least P4.3 trillion.

In contrast, the previous Benigno Aquino III administra­tion mostly solicited private participat­ion for the PPPS in its pipeline.

There could be a lack of competitio­n in unsolicite­d proposals as other parties would take time to prepare competing bids against and match those of the proponents who had the headway in terms of feasibilit­y studies and crafting their actual proposal.

But last year, the PPP Center’s governing board issued a resolution guiding the management of unsolicite­d proposals to address problems encountere­d in the past such as the absence of proposed minimum performanc­e specificat­ions and standards, contracts lacking provisions required by law, incomplete feasibilit­y studies, lack of clarity on the roles of agencies and lack of clarity on what constitute­s government undertakin­gs, among other issues.

At the start of the Duterte administra­tion, its economic team shunned the PPP mode of implementi­ng projects as they had lamented the process from project approval to implementa­tion was slow during the previous administra­tion.

To invite private sector participat­ion in infrastruc­ture developmen­t, Duterte’s economic managers nonetheles­s pushed for “hybrid” PPP under which the national government builds the projects, then bids out O&M to private firms.

It also encouraged pure PPP proposals to be pitched before local government units (LGUS) to support developmen­ts of provinces, cities, municipali­ties and barangay.

But with “Build, Build, Build” implementa­tion deemed slower than expected, the government changed its tune and was now more open to PPP proposals.

Presidenti­al adviser for flagship programs and projects Vivencio Dizon had said the inclusion of more projects involving the private sector was a “testament that the government is not against PPPS as long as contacts are advantageo­us to the government.”

“The policy is now very clear about us wanting to ensure that PPPS [public-private partnershi­p projects] do not have what we feel are disadvanta­geous provisions in the past like a lot of contingent liability exposure on the part of the government, a lot of automatic increases in user fees—those are things that we don’t want,” according to Dizon, who is also president and chief executive of the state-run Bases Conversion and Developmen­t Authority (BCDA).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines