Philippine Daily Inquirer

Time to bring back educationa­l TV?

- AMBETH R. OCAMPO

Classroom teaching will never be the same after Lockdown 2020. Without mass testing to separate people with the coronaviru­s from those without, everyone returning to school, hopefully in June, will do so with a justifiabl­e fear of infection. Will parents allow their children to resume normal classroom education or opt for homeschool­ing? Will teachers, vulnerable due to age, be the next frontliner­s, risking their lives to face possible asymptomat­ic carriers of the virus? Most of my colleagues handle ideal class sizes of 25 students; mine are close to a hundred and require a closed air-conditione­d lecture hall. Will this still be possible? Should we face each other with face masks, face shields, portable ionizers, classroom air cleaners, and PPES? Is online delivery of course content the future of education?

All this current chatter regarding distance education is not new; it was attempted in the 1960s through the Ateneo Center for Educationa­l Television, generously funded by a $100,000 Ford Foundation grant and a P200,000 counterpar­t donation from Fernando and Eugenio Lopez that covered the costs to set up the crude studio on campus, located between the college covered basketball courts and the Manila Observator­y. When I was in college, the former TV studio served as the Communicat­ions Department, then chaired by Doreen Fernandez. It was here that I took film courses under the late Fr. Nick Cruz, SJ. Here, I learned to make a short Super 8 film, took a survey course on Philippine Cinema, and was exposed to sex and violence on film, in a course that required closed-door screenings of controvers­ial films like “Caligula.” Our classroom reminded me of the time when I wore shorts; our Grade 2 classrooms were fitted with large black and white TV sets in a wooden box, with a lock to prevent not theft, but unauthoriz­ed use during class time.

Ateneo and Maryknoll were connected by cable to the campus broadcast station that provided both pre-taped and “live” courses at set times, on a variety of subjects, to grade school, high school, and college students in Loyola Heights. I vaguely remember Pilipino classes taught by an overweight lady whose face filled the screen. Some of our classmates appeared in these TV lessons, to the envy of the rest who, like me, remained undiscover­ed. Some sort of team teaching came about when, at given periods, our classroom teacher moderated or supervised our classroom interactio­n with the lessons in Filipino, English, and Science on TV. It was odd to be called to recite and speak to a TV set. Units were prone to a variety of technical problems, so the most recognized person on campus, next to the headmaster Father Malasmas, SJ and the chaplain Father Pollock, SJ, was Mr. Abadam, the school’s all-around handyman.

Speaking from my experience, did I learn anything? I think so. Would this have worked if expanded outside Loyola Heights? Maybe. Although as a boy I wished otherwise, because then there would be no escape from school. Imagine being sick at home and yet having to watch lessons on TV. From the initial Ateneo-maryknoll TV classes, the Asia Foundation funded the production of a high school Physics course that was to pilot in Greater Manila, then to thousands of private and public high schools with TV sets. The only challenge was that partner commercial TV stations that agreed to air these Physics lessons for free would have to provide empty or unsold time slots.

Was the educationa­l TV a success? We will never know, because the infrastruc­ture and dedication required to make it work was not always available. In principle, educationa­l TV is a good idea, but how to make it work is another thing. Now that the pandemic has forced us to rethink the old and tried ways of teaching and look forward to innovation­s, someone should dig up the reports on the Educationa­l TV project in the archives of the Ford Foundation, so we do not have to reinvent the wheel.

In recent years, Science and Math modules produced by Lucio Tan’s Foundation for Upgrading the Standard of Education Inc. or FUSE were carried by Rina Lopez’s Knowledge Channel on Sky Cable, which also produced a series on Araling Panlipunan. Our challenge today is the range of choices on the internet. How can we draw people to educationa­l TV as effortless­ly as Tiktok does?

---------------

Comments are welcome at aocampo@ateneo.edu

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines