Philippine Daily Inquirer

WHO REVIEWING REPORT URGING NEW GUIDANCE OVER AIRBORNE SPREAD OF CORONAVIRU­S

-

GENEVA/CHICAGO—THE World Health Organizati­on (WHO) is reviewing a report urging it to update guidance on the new coronaviru­s after more than 200 scientists, in a letter to the health agency, outlined evidence the virus can spread in tiny airborne particles.

The WHO says SARS-COV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, spreads primarily through small droplets expelled from the nose and mouth of an infected person that quickly sink to the ground.

But in an open letter to the Geneva-based agency, published on Monday in the Clinical Infectious Diseases journal, 239 scientists in 32 countries outlined evidence that they say shows floating virus particles can infect people who breathe them in.

Update guidance

Because those smaller particles can linger in the air, the scientists are urging the WHO to update its guidance.

“We are aware of the article and are reviewing its contents with our technical experts,” WHO spokespers­on Tarik Jasarevic said on Monday in an email.

How frequently the coronaviru­s can spread by the airborne or aerosol route—as opposed to by larger droplets in coughs and sneezes—is not clear.

Any change in the WHO’S assessment of risk of transmissi­on could affect its current advice on keeping 1-meter of physical distancing. Government­s, which rely on the agency for guidance policy, may also have to adjust public health measures aimed at curbing the spread of the virus.

Although the WHO has said it is considerin­g aerosols as a possible route of transmissi­on, it has yet to be convinced that the evidence warrants a change in guidance.

Dr. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota, said the WHO has long been reluctant to acknowledg­e aerosol transmissi­on of influenza, “in spite of compelling data,” and sees the current controvers­y as part of that simmering debate.

“I think the frustratio­n level has finally boiled over with regard to the role that airborne transmissi­on plays in diseases like influenza and SARSCOV-2,” Osterholm said.

Possible, even likely

Professor Babak Javid, an infectious disease consultant at Cambridge University Hospitals, said airborne transmissi­on of the virus was possible and even likely, but added that evidence over how long the virus stayed airborne was lacking.

If it can hang in the air for long periods of time, even after an infected person leaves that space, that could affect the measures health-care workers and others take to protect themselves.

The WHO guidance to health workers, dated June 29, says SARS-COV-2 is primarily transmitte­d through respirator­y droplets and on surfaces.

But airborne transmissi­on is possible in some circumstan­ces, such as when performing intubation and aerosol-generating procedures, the WHO says. It advises medical workers performing such procedures to wear heavy duty N95 respirator­y masks and other protective equipment in an adequately ventilated room.

Dr. William Hanage, an epidemiolo­gist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said the report under review at the WHO “makes many reasonable points about the evidence that this mode of transmissi­on can happen, and they should be taken seriously.”

But how often airborne transmissi­on happens, which is unknown, also matters.

“If airborne transmissi­on is possible but rare, then eliminatin­g it wouldn’t have a huge impact,” he said in emailed comments.

Officials at South Korea’s Centers for Disease Control said on Monday they were continuing to discuss various issues about COVID-19, including the possibilit­y of airborne transmissi­on. They said more investigat­ions and evidence were needed.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines