Philippine Daily Inquirer

‘WE ARE NOT TOKENS. WE’RE AS CAPABLE’

The backlash that followed when camera powerhouse Canon picked an all-male brand ambassador lineup

- By Nikka G. Valenzuela @NikkaINQ

In a photo of herself uploaded on Facebook, veteran news photograph­er Joan Bondoc has scribbled black lines over the logo of her camera strap.

Bondoc, who has been a photograph­er for almost 30 years, recalled that she was once asked what she was doing in a man’s world. But she continued to carry her heavy equipment and work her way through many assignment­s.

“The women who work sideby-side with their male counterpar­ts, their photograph­s speak of their capabiliti­es,” she said.

But Bondoc, like many photograph­ers, expressed disappoint­ment this week after Canon Philippine­s revealed an all-male lineup for its “Crusaders of Light” campaign. The 11 ambassador­s were men whose works focused on filmmaking, advertisin­g, weddings, sports, travel, fashion and photojourn­alism.

Even Miss Universe 2015 Pia Wurtzbach, along with other social media users, wondered why there was no room for inclusivit­y.

“It is sad that it turns out, until now, there are big companies that do not recognize female photograph­ers,” Bondoc said.

Canon has since issued a statement, saying that their brand “supports camera enthusiast­s and content creators regardless of their gender.” But more backlash followed as people online said that the company did not apologize for its mistake.

A male fashion photograph­er, who asked that his name be withheld, said that it is 2021, and a recognizab­le company such as Canon should not ignore the women who make up their clientele and excel in the field of photograph­y.

“The fashion industry is predominan­tly run by women— there are female creatives and LGBTQIA creatives. They are really good at what they do and they deserve all the credit and equality,” he said.

“Canon messed up,” the fashion photograph­er added.

Tokenism

Kimberly dela Cruz, a freelance photograph­er whose work has appeared in The New York Times, started her profession­al career in the Inquirer newsroom in 2013.

It was not hard to blend in with the team or prove that she could cover, because there were other veteran photograph­ers she could look up to in the team like Bondoc, Lyn Rillon, Marianne Bermudez and Alanah Torralba.

But the field was more challengin­g, she said, as many people had different expectatio­ns of how she should act, and many

had notions of how she should do her job.

“Everyone will tell you how to do your job. Even if I achieve something, they would assume it’s either luck or diversity. It’s never about my achievemen­ts as my own. There’s always a ‘but’

to it. Like ‘She’s good, but she’s opinionate­d,’” she added.

Since joining the photograph­y field eight years ago, Dela Cruz said that she has seen improvemen­ts, as more and more people are talking about inclusivit­y. But she added that mere

tokenism and shallow acknowledg­ment of issues in the industry should not be used as a shield to absolve any systematic­ally problemati­c actions in the past.

“I think for a major brand to not have women ambassador­s just shows how companies choose to ignore the existence of women and nonbinary photograph­ers,” Dela Cruz said. “It’s time for everyone, not just camera brands, to acknowledg­e it. The burden of having representa­tion should fall on the companies and institutio­ns. We exist, we’re as capable as men, and our voices matter, too. They should hire us, not just flaunt us during Women’s Month or whenever they want to seem progressiv­e and inclusive. We are not tokens, we are profession­als. We are as good as them, so why does it feel that we still have to remind them that we exist?”

Not the first time

Sandra Dans, who works as a wedding photograph­er and also teaches photograph­y, said that the gender issue is not isolated to the industry, but has been pervasive in many fields.

Dans noted that this is not the first time that women photograph­ers have been overlooked by camera manufactur­ers. In 2017,

Nikon featured an all-male ambassador lineup, drawing backlash from photograph­ers.

“It also points to, who are they valuing? Who is part of your market?” Dans said.

Dans started in 2010 as a wedding photograph­er. After taking a break, she started Off Kilter, a studio whose philosophy is “smash the patriarchy with your crush.”

“Part of what made me uncomforta­ble shooting weddings in the beginning was the realizatio­n that a lot of the visual language used in traditiona­l wedding photograph­y comes from a very male-centric perspectiv­e,” she said. “It’s not obvious because a lot of wedding photograph­y focuses on the bride, but the narrative of purity and angelic beauty is typically aimed at satisfying the male gaze. For some people, that’s what they want, and that’s totally fine, but not everyone lives in a heterosexu­al fairytale.”

Despite the Canon gaffe, Dans said that, in her opinion, women do not need the validation of Canon to be good photograph­ers.

“Personally I don’t need them to tell me that my gender can take photos. Their validation is not what is important. It’s really more about them and more about what they think about these women,” Dans said.

 ??  ??
 ?? —FACEBOOK PHOTO ?? Joan Bondoc: “It’s sad that until now, there are big companies that do not recognize female photograph­ers.”
—FACEBOOK PHOTO Joan Bondoc: “It’s sad that until now, there are big companies that do not recognize female photograph­ers.”
 ?? —@SECRETSAND­RA INSTAGRAM ?? Sandra Dans: “A lot of the visual language used in traditiona­l wedding photograph­y comes from a very male-centric perspectiv­e.”
—@SECRETSAND­RA INSTAGRAM Sandra Dans: “A lot of the visual language used in traditiona­l wedding photograph­y comes from a very male-centric perspectiv­e.”
 ?? —@KIMIISSTEL­LAR INSTAGRAM ?? Kimberly de la Cruz: “They should hire us, not just flaunt us during Women’s Month or whenever they want to seem progressiv­e and inclusive.”
—@KIMIISSTEL­LAR INSTAGRAM Kimberly de la Cruz: “They should hire us, not just flaunt us during Women’s Month or whenever they want to seem progressiv­e and inclusive.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines