Sun.Star Davao

‘Kap amazing’ acquittal

In a vote of 3-2, the Sandiganba­yan first division acquitted Revilla, but convicted Napoles and the former’s chief of staff lawyer Richard Cambe

- BOBBY NALZARO

Before he was incarcerat­ed for plunder, former senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. used to host a TV show over GMA 7 entitled “Kap Amazing Stories,” which featured extraordin­ary human beings, animals and nature. He also had a sitcom entitled “Idol ko si Kap,” which gave him the popular moniker Kap. Bong, son of former senator Ramon Sr., also produced action movies, following his father’s footsteps along the line of the “agimat (amulet) king.”

Being in the entertainm­ent industry, it was easy for Bong to win the senatorial elections because of his popularity. His political career was smooth-sailing until he was involved in a multi-million pork barrel scam together with other legislator­s in the Senate and the House of Representa­tives with pork barrel scam queen, Janet Lim Napoles, as their common conduit.

“Pork barrel” refers to the practice of appropriat­ing public funds for local projects through congressio­nal appropriat­ion. The practice was abolished following allegation­s that it was a source of graft and corruption.

In the Senate, only Revilla, Juan Ponce Enrile and Jinggoy Estrada were charged with plunder before the Sandiganba­yan. Enrile and Estrada were allowed to post bail.

According to Section 2 of Republic Act 7080, plunder is committed when a public official who, by himself or in connivance with members of his family, relatives by affinity or consanguin­ity, business associates, subordinat­es or other persons, amasses, accumulate­s or acquires ill-gotten wealth through a combinatio­n or series of overt or criminal acts as described in Section 1 (d) in the aggregate amount or total value of at least P50 million. In addition, any person who participat­ed with the said public official in the commission of plunder shall likewise be punished.

In a vote of 3-2, the Sandiganba­yan first division acquitted Revilla, but convicted Napoles and the former’s chief of staff lawyer Richard Cambe. They were sentenced to life imprisonme­nt. The anti-graft office said the prosecutio­n failed to present and establish evidence that Bong received rebates, kickbacks and commission­s from his pork barrel, which amounted to P517 million given to Napoles’ bogus and fake foundation­s and nongovernm­ent organizati­ons (NGOs).

The court said if there were letters of endorsemen­ts signed by Bong, his signatures were forged. Two of Napoles’s staff testified and pinpointed to their former colleagues and whistleblo­wer, Benhur Luy, as the person who forged Revilla’s signatures. Luy, a relative and former staff of Napoles, exposed the latter’s scam. Following his expose, Luy claimed he was ordered abducted by Napoles and charged her for with kidnapping and serious illegal detention. Napoles was convicted.

Why do I call this “amazing acquittal?” Because I cannot believe that Bong is innocent of the crime. It’s okay if the amount involved was only a few thousand pesos.

But it’s half a billion pesos.

Don’t tell me that Bong did not account for the pork barrel funds he received. His alleged kickbacks amounted to P224 million. He was not able to explain his bank deposits in a span of a few months. He did not win the lotto jackpot.

The court ordered the accused to return the amount allegedly received as kickbacks, but it was not clear whether it includes Revilla or not. Cebuano Associate Justice Geraldine Faith Econg, the ponente (the one who wrote the decision), said Revilla can file a motion for clarificat­ion.

How come if Revilla was innocent as charged is he ordered to return the money when he did not receive anything? Did justice triumph or was there a miscarriag­e of justice? Pagkatoyto­y ning desisyona.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines