NADAL’S ABSENCE DULLS ROLAND GARROS
THERE’S a reason a statue of Rafael Nadal stands outside Court Philippe Chatrier on the southwest outskirts of Paris.
No player ever lorded over any Grand Slam tennis tournament the way Nadal has ruled the French Open, winning it year after year after year for a read-it-again-to-make-sure total of 14 times. It is impossible to overstate what a monumental development it is that Nadal’s name will be absent from the bracket when play begins Sunday.
The last time they held the clay-court major without him? Back in 2004 – back before women and men received equal prize money there, before the main stadium was reconstructed with a retractable roof, before night sessions were added to the schedule.
“Him and Roland Garros is something special,” said Coco Gauff, the 19-year-old Floridian who was the runner-up to Iga Swiatek for the 2022 women’s title in Paris. “I remember last year ... I made the mistake of doubting him. Next thing you know, he pretty much stormed his way to the final and won in straight sets.”
Then, using the now-familiar acronym for “Greatest of All-Time,” Gauff continued: “He’s just a ‘GOAT’ in that way.
A ‘GOAT’ on clay. Someone you can’t underestimate.”
Every man in the field – well, every realistic and honest man – knew there was one player to avoid in the draw. And they all knew it was almost certain that Nadal would leave France with yet another Coupe des Mousquetaires. His career record at Roland Garros: 112-3.
“He’s obviously always going to be the favorite,” said Casper Ruud, the Norwegian who was the runner-up to Nadal last year, “if he plays.”
He won’t play this time: Nadal, who turns 37 on June 3, ruled himself out last week with the hip flexor injury that’s sidelined him since January. His aim is to return to Paris in 2024 for what probably would be his last French Open.
“Roland Garros will always be Roland Garros, with or without me,” Nadal said, “without a doubt.”
Perhaps. Really, though, no tennis event and athlete are linked quite the way this event and this athlete are.
So the question becomes: Who takes advantage of his absence?
Will it be the wunderkind considered an heir apparent, Carlos Alcaraz, who won the U.S. Open in September at age 19, finished last season ranked No. 1 and just returned to that spot? What about Novak Djokovic, who owns two victories against Nadal at the French
Open and two titles of his own at the place? Or Daniil Medvedev, coming off his first clay title? Or Holger Rune, who’s beaten Djokovic twice in a row?
“I see it maybe more open this year than the other years,” Rune said. “It’s interesting. It makes it more fun.”
The stakes for Djokovic are obvious: A championship would be his 23rd at a Slam, breaking a tie with Nadal for the men’s record. As it is, the 36-year-old from Serbia has won 10 of the past 19 major trophies.
Nadal collected a half-dozen in that span, while three men claimed one apiece, all at the U.S. Open: Alcaraz, Medvedev and Dominic Thiem.
For quite a while, folks have been wondering when the Big Three would give way to the next group. Roger Federer retired last year. Nadal appears close to joining him. Djokovic is still thriving, although he did deal with discomfort in his surgically repaired right elbow lately.
“A new generation is here already. I mean, Alcaraz is No. 1 in the world . ... Obviously, he’s playing amazing tennis. I think it’s also good for our sport that we have new faces, new guys coming up. It’s normal. We’ve been saying this for years — that we can expect it to come, that moment to come, when you have kind of a shift of generations,” Djokovic said. /