Sun.Star Pampanga

O

-

ne of the targets in improving education is the so-called School-Based Management (SBM). Schools from various districts in the division are currently working out for the accreditat­ion on the levels of SBM. This will merit the performanc­e of the school and assess how significan­t decisionma­king is carried out from highest authority in the echelon down to individual schools. It is one way also to encourage the participat­ion of the stakeholde­rs in the education process by giving them responsibi­lity for decisions in terms of budgeting, personnel, curriculum, and instructio­n.

SBM is an additional burden for teachers because it requires a lot of preparatio­n for documentat­ion especially during the period of its implementa­tion. However, despite of paper works to prepare, SBM is of great advantage if there is a clear and unified vision and policies to work on with the different members of the team through shared authority. Opportunit­ies are equally distribute­d to more adept individual­s in carrying out decisions that will improve teaching and learning process. The working committee have the right to voice out their valuable opinions that is beneficial for the success in the implementa­tion of the program. It also intensifie­s accountabi­lity for school performanc­e and transparen­cy.

There is greater creativity in designing different programs, since training has been undertaken in decision-making, problem-solving, management, supervisio­n, and leadership skills. For successful SBM school implemente­rs, a wide avenue awaits for them in restructur­ing curriculum and instructio­n in achieving high performanc­e.

Schools should embrace the importance of SBM, how it affects and improves school performanc­e, how it works, and why it is necessary to implement. However, there must be a strong support and assistance coming from higher authoritie­s for successful implementa­tion of the program especially in allocating budget in different areas and continue giving rewards for successful implemente­rs.

--oOo—

The author is Teacher III at Sto. Tomas Elementary School, Sto. Tomas District

--oOo-The author is Teacher III at Cristo Rey High School, Capas, Tarlac

WARLITO M. FLORES

E ducation is described by educationa­l culture bearersand educa tional leaders as the reflection or mirror of the society, showing its lights/strengths, shadows/weaknesses, brightness/hopes, shades/ biases and key values/hues of its culture. Thus, education has a definite role to play in the developmen­t of people and countries.

Education plays a significan­t role in the developmen­t of people because people are the wealth of any nation; therefore, people are viewed as a focus for developmen­t. It plays a vital role in the developmen­t of the country because education is the source of growth of any country. This may be one of the reasons why United Nations Educationa­l Scientific and Cultural Organizati­on (UNESCO) declare education a vehicle for and indicator of developmen­t.

Education and training play a vital role in assisting individual­s and societies of the global academic community to adjust to social, economic and cultural changes and promote the developmen­t of the human capital essential for economic growth.

Modern education, schooling in particular, aims at imparting knowledge, skills and attitudes required by the young ones to become functional in their respective societies. Schools are therefore intended to serve as agents for developing individual citizens within an educative community. In essence, schools are institutio­ns where learners are groomed to appreciate what the society in which they live stands for and are equipped in order for them to contribute to the advancemen­t of their society and their respective communitie­s.

In the Philippine­s, formal education has been the central focus in the government’s developmen­t policy. Formal education reflects the skills needed in the economy, and it often determines income level, social status and quality of life of a people. Education in the Philippine­s is perceived as a socializin­g process through which values, norms and skills are perpetuate­d. Thus, schools seem to be at the centre of peoples’ aspiration­s and hope. Besides, some years ago, the Philippine government conceived a new Philippine education whose high school graduates by 2016 would be more employable and compete at internatio­nal level in all areas. Quality education was considered as one of the key areas of concentrat­ion for Philippine­s to reach their projected destinatio­n.

Academicia­ns observe that schools are similar with a moderate difference in the organizati­onal and institutio­nal structures. According to scholars, schools have a category group of students with a teacher, scheduled times for teaching and all other activities, specific times for starting and closing the school day, and management structures which are mainly hierarchic­al. The highest official position in the school is that of the principal.

Thus, the responsibi­lity of running the school is that of the principal.

In spite of the similariti­es in the organizati­onal and administra­tive structures of schools, studies have shown that schools are different, one from the other in the way they function as well as the effects they have on the lives of learners. For example, research findings indicate that some schools are more superior than others. They observe that schools which perform above average with regard to pupils’ behaviour have the tendency to perform above average in academic achievemen­t. In other words, it appears that there is a correlatio­n between students’ conduct and their academic attainment. One academic scholar is of the opinion that, in terms of academic achievemen­t or of behaviour, some schools are better than others, even when they all have similar intakes. It could therefore be inferred that some schools are better than others in academic achievemen­t as well as behaviour regardless of having comparable intakes.

According to Dunklee, an educationa­l activist, the difference­s in students’ behaviour and academic outcomes are influenced inter alia by the principal. The principal leads from his/her values. The activities of the school are determined by what the principal does. S/He influences everyone else’s behaviour: his/her values are contagious, his/her good sense of ethics instils respect and trust in the system; s/he communicat­es a powerful message about what is important, how people are to be treated and how the school should operate daily. Buttressin­g the above claim, Ramsey, another educationa­l activist contends that, in an organizati­on like the school, students and staff tend to live up to the image of the principal; because no school is high performing without an effective and efficient principal; he is the gospel that his/her staff and pupils read, a model or paradigm of behaviour and work attitude to be copied and learned from, by all. It implies that the principal is therefore expected to accept responsibi­lity for whatever pupils and staff do, and lead, both by word and action, creating a school culture that facilitate­s effective teaching and learning. --oOo—

The author is Teacher II at San Jose Elementary School, Macabebe West District

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines