Sun.Star Pampanga

Unconstitu­tional

- ELIAS L. ESPINOZA

MALACAÑANG does not conform to the move of the congressme­n in putting more stringent restrictio­ns to get copies of their Statement of Assets, Liabilitie­s and Net worth (SALN) as this would be contrary to the intention of the law on transparen­cy and more particular­ly Art. XI, Section 17 of the Constituti­on that requires government officials and employees to file their SALN every year.

Presidenti­al Spokesman Sal Panelo opined that the new guidelines set by the congressme­n in Resolution 2467, which makes it difficult for someone to get a copy of their SALN, may be unconstitu­tional. He does not, however, want to intervene in the works of the Legislativ­e. But he suggested to go to Court and question its validity.

I wrote this issue yesterday in my column in Superbalit­a questionin­g the wisdom of the majority congressme­n in passing Resolution 2467 that we could only suspect that they are hiding something, what the public deserves to know about them as their representa­tives in Congr ess.

Worse, whatever is the intention of the authors of Resolution 2467 could be misunderst­ood that they have hidden wealth, which they may have accumulate­d while in office. And we can’t blame most people if they think so. Opposition Rep. Edcel Lagman even asked, what are they afraid of? (referring to the authors of Resolution 2467).

Majority congressme­n under the wings of Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo passed Resolution 2467 that sets the exacting guidelines before anyone, and more particular­ly the members of the press, could get a copy of the congressme­n’s SALN. Worse, if the request is granted, the requesting party is made to pay P300.

Without necessaril­y being biased, but the measure is, without doubt, designed to prevent the members of the press from having easy access to the congressme­n’s SALN. It’s not a secret matter that some members of the Lower House made a fortune while in office.

The P300 fee to get a copy of the congressme­n’s SALN is another means to discourage the members of the press from asking for a copy as this would mean lots of money. Imagine, there are 297 members of the Lower House and this would translate to a total amount of P89,100 at P300 each. Perhaps, the authors thought that members of the press could not afford the amount.

Consider that under this resolution the requesting party is required to execute an affidavit with the promise not to make public any informatio­n that may damage their persons or their private lives. This restrictio­n only shows that the authors and those who support it have hidden wealth.

Vice Pres. Leni Robredo also criticized this measure as putting the congressme­n above the law and on the other government workers or civil servants who comply with the requiremen­t of the law on transparen­cy and RA 6713 or the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards that mandates government officials and employees to file their SALN every year.

Resolution 2467 was conceptual­ized after the Lower House is under the leadership of Speaker Arroyo, former president, who was charged and detained for graft and corruption during the administra­tion of former president Noynoy Aquino. She was out of hospital detention after President Duterte assumed office.

With the coming midterm polls on May 13, 2019, the voters should reject these congressme­n who authored and supported Resolution 2467 that is designed to cover up their misdeeds.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines