Fernandino

that he was able to pay the real property tax in 2017, but failed in 2018 “due to lack of financial capability.”

He stressed that the land was awarded to them by the Department of Agrarian Reform several years back and were diligent in paying its dues to ensure that it will not be invalidated.

According to the law, a property can be considered tax-delinquent and may be up for public auction if the owner failed to settle its real property tax for at least 36 months, and the interest that it accrued while unpaid.

The group claimed that payment of real property tax is “being manipulated by investors who team up with local leaders in forcing land owners to sell their properties” to expand their businesses.

“Farmers in the city experience being neglected or not being aided by local leaders for the development of their lands. This we see as deliberate and aimed at making it impossible for them to maintain the upkeep of their farms, forcing them to sell their lands to investors who, more often than not, are partners with the local leaders,” the farmers group claimed.

Supreme Court order

Meanwhile, CAO head Luz Bautista, in a separate interview, clarified that the office’s refusal to accept Salvador’s payment for real property tax is an implementation of a Supreme Court order served to them in 2018.

She disclosed that Salvador’s concern is a land dispute problem between the farmers and a certain Whitaker family which originally owned the lot and which case must be addressed to the court, and not to the CAO or the city government as a whole.

“This land dispute problem goes way, way back. The Whitakers have been dealing with this concern ever since and just recently, they brought an order from the Supreme Court to cancel the farmers’ emancipation patents (EPs),” she explained.

EPs are the legal instruments that secure the ownership and tenure of the farmers to the land.

Bautista said Salvador and other farmers were urged to air and discuss their concerns with the Whitakers and the court as the CAO is only following the court order, otherwise they will be cited in contempt.

She also clarified that CAO only cancelled the properties’ tax declaration in compliance with the said court order but were not responsible and do not have the power to cancel any land titles.

“It is the regional office who cancels the land titles. If the regional office decides to reinstate the land titles to farmers, we will be declaring them again but until we do not receive a new order, we will follow what we have,” she said.