Tempo

BONG REVILLA ACQUITTED

- By CZARINA NICOLE O. ONG

The Sandiganba­yan Special First Division yesterday acquitted former Sen. Ramon “Bong” B. Revilla Jr. of plunder in connection with his alleged involvemen­t in the multi-billion peso Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund or “pork barrel” fund scam.

The Sandiganba­yan Special First Division yesterday acquitted former Sen. Ramon “Bong” B. Revilla Jr. of plunder in connection with his alleged involvemen­t in the multi-billion peso Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund or “pork barrel” fund scam.

On the other hand, the anti-graft court found businesswo­man Janet L. Napoles and Revilla’s former chief of staff, Richard Cambe, guilty of plunder.

Cambe and Napoles were sentenced to reclusion perpetua with perpetual absolute disqualifi­cation from holding any public office.

“For failure of the prosecutio­n to establish beyond reasonable doubt that accused Revilla received, directly or indirectly, the rebates, commission, and kickbacks from his PDAF, the Court cannot hold him liable for the crime of plunder,” the dispositiv­e portion of the decision said.

Cambe and Napoles were also “held solidarily and jointly liable” to return

₱124,500,000 to the national treasury pursuant to Article 100 of the Revised Penal Code.

The 186-page decision did not state who among them should pay, but according to the law, only those who are criminally liable in the case should be held civilly liable. Since Revilla is not criminally liable, his lawyers have claimed that he is not required to pay.

After being cleared of plunder, Revilla immediatel­y posted a ₱480,000 bail for the 16 counts of graft before the Clerk of Court of the Sandiganba­yan First Division.

The First Division is comprised of chairperso­n Efren dela Cruz and Associate Justices Geraldine Faith Econg and Edgardo Caldona. All three of them have to reach the same conclusion for a decision to be promulgate­d.

Econg and Caldona voted for Revilla’s acquittal. Since Dela Cruz dissented, a special division was created with two special members from other divisions – Associate Justices Maria Theresa Dolores Gomez-Estoesta and Georgina Dumpit-Hidalgo.

Hidalgo voted for acquittal while Estoesta dissented. As a result, the majority vote, which is to acquit, won.

Econg said that she hopes the public would understand how they came to their conclusion. She knows Revilla’s acquittal is an “unpopular decision,” they have to go by the evidence.

“I would have loved to be a heroine, that I convicted him. But at the end of the day, we are bound by evidence of the prosecutio­n and defense,” she said.

In the decision, the justices stated that they are “unanimous” in the conclusion that Cambe and Napoles are “guilty as charged.”

“However, the majority of us harbor serious doubts as to the culpabilit­y of Revilla beyond reasonable doubt,” they said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines