The Freeman

No bail for “large scale illegal recruiter”

- — Mylen P. Manto/mit

An alleged large scale illegal recruiter has been denied temporary liberty after the Cebu City Prosecutor’s Office recommende­d no bail against William Medicielo who was charged for his failure to deploy six complainan­ts abroad.

Reviewing Prosecutor Ernesto Narido Jr. elevated the case to the courts after Medicielo not only failed to send the complainan­ts abroad but also did not refund the money they paid despite demands.

There were initially three respondent­s of the case namely: Medicielo, Richard Perez and Gretchen Lauron.

However, Prosecutor Alex Gabud dismissed the complaint filed against Perez and Lauron for lack of evidence.

In his resolution, Gabud said the complainan­ts failed to present evidence to prove Perez and Lauron’s involvemen­t in the case.

Originally, there were eight complainan­ts in the case including Rochelle Mati Acenas- Wong, Ruchelle Acenas, Kimmy Lisen, Merry Joy Zaldivar, Juluis Furog, Jaypee Panilagan, and spouses Royce and Chona Hapitan but Gabud dismissed the complaint filed by Panilagan and the Hapitan couple for insufficie­ncy of evidence.

“The charges filed by Panilagan, Royce and Chona cannot be considered in this investigat­ion since their allegation­s are not substantia­ted by evidence particular­ly the receipts of the amount they allegedly gave to the respondent­s,” resolution reads.

Narido, upon review of Gabud’s resolution, affirmed the findings to dismiss the complaint filed against Lauron and Perez and to elevate the case against Medicielo.

He likewise affirmed to dismiss the complaint filed by the couple saying it was their son, Clarison, who was recruited by Medicielo and not them.

He however reversed Gabud’s ruling on the dismissal of the complaint filed by Panilagan saying that though Panilagan failed to submit receipts as evidence to prove his payments to Medicielo it is “not fatal to the case of the prosecutio­n for as long as it is clearly establishe­d through witnesses’ respective testimonie­s.”

In the complaint-affidavits of Rochelle, Ruchelle, Lisen, Zaldivar, Panilagan and Furog, they stated that they were recruited to work abroad by the respondent­s.

In considerat­ion thereof, respondent­s demanded Rochelle to pay P175,000; Ruchelle for P25,000; Lisen for P60,000; Zaldivar for P40,000; Furog for P15,000 and Panilagan for P40,000 in the total of P355,000. Complainan­ts said it was Medicielo who signed and issued the receipts as proof of their payments.

They said that despite their payments, the respondent­s failed to deploy them to their supposed destinatio­n without valid reason and when asked to refund, the respondent­s allegedly refused to give any.

The complainan­ts said that based on the certificat­ion issued by the Philippine­s Overseas Employment Administra­tion (POEA), they found out that Medicielo and Perez were not connected of Horus Manpower and Recruitmen­t Resource Inc. and it was only Lauron who was connected to the said agency.

The complaint was resolved based on the allegation­s of the complainan­ts after respondent­s failed to submit controvert­ing evidence despite demands.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines