Dirty elections make corruption the norm
Certainly, in every election year, the economy expands. That’s a no-brainer. Whether coming from legitimate or illegitimate sources, money freely flows. These are recklessly released for the candidates’ vote-gathering activities.
For one, they spend millions for their visibility initiatives (mainstream media or social media). More than that, wads of bills are also spent for their vote-buying efforts. In turn, recipients (voters) use these sums of money to purchase goods and services, thus, the multiplier effect. With these activities plus the usually increased government spending (local and national) during election year for infrastructures, the economy expands.
Yes, as records reveal, it is true that election-related activities propel the economy. So tempting that we might even entertain the idea of having an election every year. However, the truth is, in the kind of election that we have, the downside is horrible.
Undeniably, our kind of politics is totally dirty from the beginning to end. The battle-tested but dirty approaches are just so compelling for the men and women who had been in it or are yet to squeeze themselves curiously into a messy world of entertainment we call politics, or distinctively, our brand of politics.
This is a kind of politics where every coveted position has a price tag. Therefore, anyone who can afford gets it. Obviously, it is a kind of politics where the politicians’ willingness to dangle billions or millions is the main determinant. Consequently, as they part with it, they shall be equally determined to get it back, of course, with profits.
But how are returns assured? There are countless of ways but, absolutely, not from their salaries. Certainly, they cannot live with salaries alone. More often, they milk or exploit on projects or any forms of procurements. Unfortunately, such and other countless of ways are the primary reasons of our being undisputedly at the bottom of every corruption survey.
The annual Transparency International’s (TI) Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), for instance, can attest to this. TI’s corruption surveys “draw on assessments and opinion surveys carried out by independent and reputable institutions. These surveys and assessments include questions related to the bribery of public officials, kickbacks in public procurement, embezzlement of public funds, and the effectiveness of public sector anticorruption efforts”.
With that as basis, despite President Duterte’s rhetoric of not tolerating even a “whiff of corruption”, we went further down. For instance, in the 2020 survey, we placed 115th out of 179, or two notches down from 2019 where we placed 113th out of 180. Considering that we placed 99th among 180 in 2018, it simply