The Philippine Star

Low-dose prevention

(USPSTF updates guidelines for aspirin therapy)

- By CHARLES C. CHANTE, MD

Many patients aged 50- 59 years should start low-dose aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovasc­ular disease and colorectal cancer, according to the US Preventive Services Task Force’s updated clinical practice guideline on aspirin therapy, published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

The evidence is clear that the benefits outweigh the potential harms of low-dose aspirin in this age group if patients have a 10 percent or greater 10year cardiovasc­ular disease (CVD) risk, are not at increased risk of bleeding, have a life expectancy of at least 10 years, and are willing to take the treatment for at least 10 years, said in the USPSTF.

The organizati­on based this guideline on two systematic reviews of the literature, updating its 2009 review on aspirin therapy to prevent cardiovasc­ular disease an updating its 2007 review on aspirin therapy to prevent colorectal cancer.

The findings from these reviews of the current evidence were used to develop a decision analysis model to weigh the benefits and harms of treatment in various patient groups defined by age, gender, and risk factors.

Recent studies of primary prevention of CVD, which included 118,445 participan­ts, “consistent­ly demonstrat­ed effectiven­ess of aspirin in preventing nonfatal MI and stroke.”

Pooled analyses showed that low- dose aspirin reduced nonfatal MI and coronary events 17 percent and that any aspirin dose reduced them 22 percent.

Low-dose aspirin also reduced all-cause mortality risk in pooled analyses.

Aspirin therapy also reduced the risk of colorectal cancer, but this benefit didn’t appear until after five to 10 years of treatment. Three trials reported a 40 percent reduction after 10-20 years of daily low-dose aspirin.

On the other side of the equation, major GI bleeding increased by 65 percent among aspirin users when the data from 15 CVD prevention trials were pooled.

Similarly, pooled analyses showed a 33 percent increase in hemorrhagi­c stroke among aspirin users, compared with nonusers.

The benefits of low- dose aspirin were highest and the harms were lowest in patients aged 50-59 years, hence the first recommenda­tion in the new guideline. In patients aged 60-69 years, the benefit to harm balance isn’t as clear-cut, so the decision to initiate or continue aspirin therapy in this age group must be made on an individual basis.

“Some adults may decide that avoiding an MI or stroke is very important and that having a GI bleeding event is not as significan­t. They may decide to take aspirin at a lower CVD risk level than those who are more concerned about GI bleeding. Adults who have a high likelihood of benefit with little potential for harm should be encouraged to consider aspirin use.

“Conversely, adults who have little potential of benefit or high risk for GI bleeding should be discourage­d” from taking aspirin therapy, the investigat­ors said.

The task force found that current evidence is insufficie­nt to assess the balance of benefits and harms regarding aspirin therapy for adults younger than age 50 or older than age 70.

In the latter group in particular, the picture is complicate­d by the effects of age, use of other medication­s, and concomitan­t illness.

However, because cardiovasc­ular risks are increased after age 70 and the incidences of MI and stroke are relatively high, the benefits of preventive aspirin could be substantia­l in this age group, said the School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, and the veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Bronx.

The USPSTF guideline generally accords with existing recommenda­tions.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines