The Philippine Star

Sandiganba­yan orders ex-ERC chief tried over ‘pork’ scam

- By ELIZABETH MARCELO

The Sandiganba­yan has found sufficient grounds to proceed with the trial for graft and malversati­on cases filed against former Davao del Sur representa­tive Marc Douglas Cagas IV, former Energy Regulatory Commission ( ERC) chair Zenaida Ducut and 23 others over their alleged involvemen­t in the pork barrel scam.

In a 28- page resolution dated Dec. 2 and released to the media yesterday, the Sandiganba­yan Special Third Division denied the respective motions to quash with prayer for the dismissal of the cases filed by Cagas, Ducut and the other defendants “for lack of merit.”

“In this case the court finds that there is substantia­l basis to support the finding of probable cause for the purpose of issuing a warrant of arrest against the accused and to hold them for trial,” read the ruling penned by Division chairman and Sandiganba­yan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang.

Associate Justices Samuel Martires and Sarah Jane Fernandez concurred with the ruling.

But since Cagas, Ducut and the other respondent­s have already posted their respective bail bonds, the court recalled the arrest warrants.

In its ruling, the court dismissed Cagas’ claim that there is no evidence of conspiracy among the respondent­s and that he received kickbacks from the alleged pork barrel scam mastermind Janet LimNapoles.

“The allegation in the informatio­n that accused ‘conspiring with one another and with private individual’ is sufficient. In fact, the ‘case’ informatio­n enumerates in detail the individual participat­ion of the accused,” the resolution read.

The court said that the ombudsman, in its resolution ordering the filing of the cases, mentioned that state witness Benhur Luy in his testimony said that Cagas received kickbacks totalling P5.540 million by allocating his Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund (PDAF) or pork barrel from 2007 to 2009 to the fake foundation­s supposedly owned by Napoles.

Filed by the ombudsman before the Sandiganba­yan in April 2016, the cases against Cagas, Ducut and the other respondent­s involved two counts of violation of Section 3 (e) of Republic Act 3019 or the Anti- Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and another two counts of malversati­on of public funds as defined under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC).

Based on the informatio­n of the cases, Cagas allocated a total of P7.550 million of his PDAF to the Napoles-linked foundation­s Progress and Developmen­t Foundation Inc. (POPDFI) and Social Developmen­t Program for Farmers Foundation Inc. (SDPFFI) in exchange for kickbacks.

The ombudsman alleged that it was Cagas who personally chose Napoles-linked foundation­s POPDFI and SDPFFI to implement his PDAFfunded projects without the benefit of a public bidding required under Republic Act 9184 or the Government Procuremen­t Act.

The ombudsman said the supposed agricultur­al projects were never implemente­d.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines