The Philippine Star

Acid suppressio­n cuts cancer risk in Barrett’s esophagus

-

In patients with Barrett’s esophagus ( BE), acid suppressio­n with proton pump inhibitors ( PPIs) and histamine - receptor antagonist­s ( H RA) reduced the risk of progressio­n to esophageal adenocarci­noma (EAC), according to findings presented at the annual Digestive Disease Week.

In the nested, case- control study, PPIs reduced the risk of EAC by 69 percent and H RAs reduced the risk by 45 percent.

“The guidelines for these agents are based on symptoms of reflux. Although this study does not tell us for sure, it looks like taking these medication­s [in Barrett’s esophagus] prevents cancer,” said a postdoctor­al research fellow at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

There is a “deficiency of studies of cases with longitudin­al follow-up in a cohort of BE patients examining the effects of PPIs and H RAs on progressio­n to EAC.” “We conducted this study in a large cohort of BE patients and hypothesiz­ed that acid suppressio­n with PPIs and H RAs would decrease the risk of EAC.”

The observatio­nal study comprised 29,536 male veterans diagnosed with BE between 2004 and 2009, in the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Of those, 760 had an ICD-9 diagnosis of EAC. Cases of incident BE (in patients who developed EAC) were matched with controls with BE who did not develop cancer by the time of each EAC diagnosis in the correspond­ing case. Cases were followed until 2011.

The final analysis based on 311 cases with EAC after BE and 856 matched controls with no EAC. Use of acid suppressio­n was based on reports from a Veterans Affairs pharmacy.

Patients with EAC were significan­tly more overweight and obese than were controls and were more often cigarette smokers. Cases were less likely (65 percent) than were controls (83 percent) to fill at least one prescripti­on for a PPI. A total of 8 percent of cases had at least one prescripti­on for an H RA compared with 14 percent of controls.

For PPIs, duration of use was not associated with risk; the opposite was true for H RA users.

“Can’t say with certainty that PPI and H RA use reduce the risk of cancer,”

“But the study suggests that there may be a role for these medication­s. Further study is needed.”

It is noted that the risk of developing EAC in people with BE is low – 0.5 percent per year.

In the question and answer session, that it is disturbing that so many BE patients are not on acid suppressio­n. “There are no clear-cut guidelines that state that BE patients should be on PPI,” “Maybe that’s why primary care doctors are not prescribin­g them.”

In a talk after the presentati­on, UT Southweste­rn Medical Center, Dallas, said it appears that clonal diversity at diagnosis of BE identifies patients likely to develop EAC. “If these cells are predestine­d to become cancer, can they achieve salvation through good acts?” study suggests that they can. The malignant potential of BE may be predetermi­ned, and acid suppressio­n therapy reduces the risk of progressio­n to EAC.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines