The Philippine Star

Rises in LDL and HDL cholestero­l, triglyceri­des tied to lower diabetes risk

-

Higher levels of LDL cholestero­l, HDL cholestero­l, and triglyceri­des over a lifetime are protective against type 2 diabetes, a Mendelian randomizat­ion study has shown.

The study also bolstered establishe­d evidence that LDL cholestero­l and triglyceri­des boost the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) but showed no contributi­on of HDL cholestero­l to that risk.

Investigat­ors sought to shed light on the role of the most commonly measured lipid fractions – LDL cholestero­l, HDL cholestero­l, and triglyceri­des – in the developmen­t of CAD and diabetes, particular­ly the observed link between statin therapy and an increased risk of diabetes.

Because genotype is not modifiable by disease, a genetic instrument can be used as a model for an exposure, and “Mendelian randomizat­ion generates unbiased, unconfound­ed effect estimates that are sometimes taken as evidence of causal role,” the University College London explained.

They used data from three genome-wide associatio­n studies involving 188,577 persons with blood lipid measures 63,158 CAD cases, and 34,840 diabetes cases. All involved only people of European ancestry. Summary-level data for lipids were from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium, diabetes data came from the Diabetes Genetics Replucatio­n and Meta-analysis, and CAD data were from the Coronary Artery Disease Genome-wide Replicatio­n and Meta-analysis plus Coronary Artery Disease Genetics. From these, the investigat­ors constructe­d genetic instrument­s composed of single -nucleoride polymorphi­sms and conducted Medndelian randomizat­ions designed to adjust for the SNP’s possible associatio­ns with other traits, or pleiotropy.

The results showed that two lipid fractions were associated with reduced risk for type 2 diabetes and one had no discernibl­e effect. LDL cholestero­l showed the strongest associatio­n: An increase of 1 standard deviation, equivalent to 38 mg/dL, was tied to a 21% reduction in risk of diabetes. For HDL, a 1-SD rise of 16 mg/DL in HDL was associated with a 17% lower risk. A 1 -SD rise of triglycerd­es, 89 mg/dL, but there were statistica­l inconsiste­ncies between analyses.

The associatio­ns between 1-SD increases and CAD were consistent with convention­al wisdom: For LDL cholestero­l, CAD risk rose by 68%; for triglyceri­des, the increase was 28%; and for HDL cholestero­l, the risk was slightly reduced by 5% but was not statistica­lly significan­t.

These results can help to identify the potential effects of lipid-modifying drugs, yet although all three lipids were associated with reduced risk of diabetes, it does not necessaril­y follow that lowering of LDL cholestero­l or triglyceri­de levels through use of drugs that target specific proteins will alter the risk of diabetes. Large-scale genetic and clinical trials are needed to determine such dysglycemi­c associatio­ns.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines