The Philippine Star

Good news, bad news on ROROs

- REY GAMBOA

One of my advocacies even before I started writing this column had been on our local shipping industry. For some years now, I had been zeroing in on roll on, roll off (RORO) ships that are extensivel­y used for inter-island travel by Filipinos.

Being archipelag­ic in nature, the Philippine­s has to rely extensivel­y on ROROs – not just for travel, but more importantl­y to ferry goods, mostly agricultur­al, from the source to many points in the country. And with the country being perenniall­y in the path of storms, the need for safe ships cannot be undermined.

Sadly, this crusade seems to fall on deaf ears, with the Maritime Industry Authority (MARINA), the government’s designated regulatory agency, not doing enough when so many lives and so much property is at stake.

The Philippine­s, sadly, continues to harbor maritime disasters year after year, many of them clearly avoidable. There’s a gamut of reasons for the accidents, but for me, the biggest remains to be continued use of old, re-classed and reconditio­ned ships not fit for our seas.

More than half of our domestic ships are over 35 years of age, some even older than 45 years, which is a clear deviation of internatio­nal safety standards that place the maximum age of sea-worthiness at 20 years.

Worse, the Philippine­s has a very relaxed observance of maintenanc­e, especially for ships above 20 years old. This is compounded by the fact that second-hand ROROs have often been retooled to allow more passengers and cargo, making them less stable in local waters.

New memorandum circular

Lately, the industry has been abuzz with the good news, and this is thanks to the current MARINA leadership, that the government has started a modernizat­ion plan for RORO vessels and is seriously pursuing the appropriat­ion of various non-fiscal incentives to encourage ship owners to replace their ageing ships with new ones.

Just recently, MARINA came up with a memorandum circular that set a maximum age of 20 years for the importatio­n of second-hand RORO vessels. It would have been better if the maximum age of ship service was 20, but considerin­g the huge investment­s in shipping, we can take this one small step at a time.

The Land Transporta­tion Franchisin­g and Regulatory Board has already set a maximum age of 15 years for buses. MARINA should do likewise, especially for unclassed ROROs.

Limit age to 35

There is also talk that the MARINA is studying the mechanics of limiting the age of local passenger vessels, including ROROs, to 35. This, again, is another overdue step to improve safety of sea travel. We hope the regulatory agency will also consider imposing stricter seafaring rules for ships over 20 years of age, to give the public better safety assurance.

The memorandum also states that companies that are thinking of importing ships for local use should have these classed by the Internatio­nally Accredited Classifica­tion Society (IACS) at the time of importatio­n.

Perhaps a future MARINA memorandum circular could also stipulate that IACS coverage should be mandatory for all ships, which would pave the way for better insurance protection for both cargo and passengers during accidents.

The circular also states that MARINA will subject imported second hand vessels to ultrasonic thickness gauging to ensure that the hull wastage is not beyond 25 percent of the original thickness of steel plates.

While the regulatory agency inspects unclassed ROROs every year when the vessel is dry-docked, we hope that even such classed vessels will continue to be checked annually. Vigilance must be observed during these inspection­s, especially with regards hull thickness.

Removal of VAT exemption

Unfortunat­ely, all the good news enumerated above was accompanie­d by disturbing news, one that would seriously hamper MARINA’s planned RORO modernizat­ion program.

Perhaps in its desire to find additional sources of funds to compensate for lost income due to the restructur­e of corporate and personal income taxes, the government is looking at removing the value-added tax (VAT) exemption on the importatio­n of new builds.

If this happens, ship owners will think twice about buying brand new vessels to modernize their fleets. The planned reimpositi­on of the 12 percent VAT will make capital layout for a new ship much more expensive since new ones, without worrying about VAT, could easily cost from P400 million to P600 million each.

Luckily, Archipelag­o Philippine Ferries Group and Starlite Ferries Group had started early with their modernizat­ion programs. The two companies had already imported 12 and six brand new ROROs, respective­ly, that are internatio­nal class. But if VAT is re-imposed, we could see the last new ones.

Other shipping companies that have been enlightene­d by the wisdom of investing in new builds may have to put on hold their plans until this issue of additional tax is cleared.

Finance Secretary Sonny Dominguez and his team should rethink the move to re-impose VAT on imported vessels for the sake of the Filipino traveller. When you look at the cost of brand new vessels, having to pay for the 12 percent VAT is definitely not a small matter, and more importantl­y, the tax will definitely be passed on to the riding public, leading to higher fares. Two suggestion­s come to mind in such a situation. The first is a re-imposition of VAT, but only on the importatio­n of second-hand vessels. This would force ship owners to seriously consider buying brand new ones, especially after realizing that there is more economic benefit when you consider less expensive maintenanc­e and parts replacemen­t of new vessel.

The second suggestion is a moratorium of five to seven years on VAT payments to force shipping companies to start their fleet modernizat­ion early, and hopefully in the process, speed up the pace of having new ROROs sailing our seas. We understand the pressure on government to come up with more tax money to finance its ambitious Build Build Build infrastruc­ture program. But it must not be at the cost of lost lives and property. The safety of our ships is nonnegotia­ble. We must get rid of all those floating coffins. We are actively using two social networking websites to reach out more often and even interact with and engage our readers, friends and colleagues in the various areas of interest that I tackle in my column. Please like us at www.

facebook.com and follow us at www.twitter.com/ReyGamboa.

Should you wish to share any insights, write me at Link Edge, 25th Floor, 139 Corporate Center, Valero Street, Salcedo Village, 1227 Makati City. Or e-mail me at reydgamboa@yahoo.com. For a compilatio­n of previous articles, visit www.BizlinksPh­ilippines.net.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines