The Philippine Star

Aguirre won’t suspend prosecutor­s in Kerwin case

- By EDU PUNAY

Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II has rejected the recommenda­tion of the newly formed Presidenti­al Anti-Cor- ruption Commission (PACC) to suspend the prosecutor­s who dismissed the charges against self-confessed drug trader Kerwin Espinosa and Cebuano businessma­n Peter Lim.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) chief stressed that he saw no reason to penalize Assistant State Prosecutor­s Michael John Humarang and Aristotle Reyes and their superiors who approved their findings even as he ordered the National Bureau of Investigat­ion (NBI) to probe them, for which he apologized as being “improper

but necessary.”

“I could not see any basis for such (suspension),” he stressed in a text message.

Aguirre also questioned the basis of the PACC, which is chaired by Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption founding chairman Dante Jimenez, for coming up with such recommenda­tion.

“It appears that they are not familiar with the workings and procedures on how the DOJ conducts preliminar­y investigat­ions,” he pointed out.

He reiterated that it is not the prosecutor­s’ duty to gather evidence in a preliminar­y investigat­ion. Their task is only to evaluate the evidence presented by both parties, he said.

Humarang and Reyes, for their part, decried the PACC recommenda­tion as they vowed to disprove insinuatio­ns on their dismissal of the charges against the personalit­ies publicly tagged by President Duterte as drug lords.

“We’re just doing our sworn duty and we are ready to face the allegation­s against us,” the two said in a statement yesterday.

The prosecutor­s maintained that they followed the law and the rules when they conducted the preliminar­y investigat­ion.

“We conducted the preliminar­y investigat­ion in accordance with the applicable rules and our resolution was based only on the evidence presented to us,” they said.

“During the preliminar­y investigat­ion, the complainan­t was given all the opportunit­y to present its case. Under the present rules, we have no authority to procure evidence on the complainan­t’s behalf,” they added.

As this developed, the DOJ has started its reinvestig­ation on the drug charges against Espinosa and Lim.

The new panel led by Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Juan Pedro Navera summoned the Philippine National Police-Criminal Investigat­ion and Detection Group (PNP-CIDG) to a hearing at 1 p.m. on April 12.

The DOJ panel also issued separate subpoenas to Espinosa, Lim and other respondent­s in the case – inmate Peter Co, Max Miro, Ruel Malindanga­n, Jun Pepito and Lovely Adam Impal, as well as several other unidentifi­ed persons.

The reinvestig­ation was set “to allow the complainan­t and respondent­s to submit additional pieces of evidence in support of their respective positions.”

Apart from Navera, the other members of the new panel are Assistant State Prosecutor Anna Noreen Devanadera and prosecutio­n lawyer Herbert Calvin Abugan.

The reinvestig­ation is being conducted on orders of Aguirre following the previous dismissal of the charges, which triggered massive criticisms and even earned the ire of President Duterte.

The previous panel composed of Humarang and Reyes dismissed the charges of sale, administra­tion, dispensati­on, trading, delivery and transporta­tion of illegal drugs under Republic Act 9165 (Comprehens­ive Dangerous Drugs Act) against the respondent­s for lack of probable cause.

The prosecutor­s faulted the CIDG for presenting weak evidence and “inconsiste­ncies” in the testimony of lone witness Marcelo Adorco as reasons for dismissal of the charges.

Adorco claimed in his affidavit that Lim had supplied narcotics in “staggering amounts” to Espinosa for more than two years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines