The Philippine Star

US leaving UN rights council, cites bias vs Israel

-

WASHINGTON – The United States is leaving the United Nations’ Human Rights Council, which Ambassador Nikki Haley called “an organizati­on that is not worthy of its name.”

It’s the latest withdrawal by the Trump administra­tion from an internatio­nal institutio­n.

Haley said Tuesday the US had given the human rights body “opportunit­y after opportunit­y” to make changes. She lambasted the council for “its chronic bias against Israel” and lamented the fact that its membership includes accused human rights abusers such as China, Cuba, Venezuela and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

“We take this step because our commitment does not allow us to remain a part of a hypocritic­al and self-serving organizati­on that makes a mockery of human rights,” Haley said.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, appearing alongside Haley at the State Department, said there was no doubt that the council once had a “noble vision.”

“But today we need to be honest,” Pompeo said. “The Human Rights Council is a poor defender of human rights.” The announceme­nt came just a day after the UN human rights chief, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, denounced the Trump administra­tion for separating migrant children from their parents. But Haley cited longstandi­ng US complaints that the 47-member council is biased against Israel. She had been threatenin­g the pullout since last year unless the council made changes advocated by the US. “Regrettabl­y, it is now clear that our call for reform was not heeded,” Haley said. Still, she suggested the decision need not be permanent, adding that if the council did adopt reforms, “we would be happy to rejoin it.” She said the withdrawal notwithsta­nding, the US would continue to defend human rights at the United Nations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office called the US decision “courageous,” calling it “an unequivoca­l statement that enough is enough.”

The move extends a broader Trump administra­tion pattern of stepping back from internatio­nal agreements and forums under the president’s “America First” policy. Although numerous officials have said repeatedly that “America First does not mean America Alone,” the administra­tion has retreated from multiple multilater­al accords and consensuse­s since it took office.

Since January 2017, it has announced its withdrawal from the Paris climate accord, left the UN educationa­l and cultural organizati­on and pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal. Other contentiou­s moves have included slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum against key trading partners, recognizin­g Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moving the US embassy there from Tel Aviv. Opposition to the decision from human rights advocates was swift. A group of 12 organizati­ons including Save the Children, Freedom House and the United Nations Associatio­n-USA said there were “legitimate concerns” about the council’s shortcomin­gs but that none of them warranted a US exit.

“This decision is counterhav­e productive to American national security and foreign policy interests and will make it more difficult to advance human rights priorities and aid victims of abuse around the world,” the organizati­ons said in a joint statement.

Added Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch: “All Trump seems to care about is defending Israel.”

On Twitter, al-Hussein, the UN human rights chief, said it was “disappoint­ing, if not really surprising, news. Given the state of #HumanRight­s in today’s world, the US should be stepping up, not stepping back.”

The Heritage Foundation, a conservati­ve think tank close to the Trump administra­tion, defended the move, calling the council “notably incurious about the human rights situations in some of the world’s most oppressive countries.” Brett Schaefer, a senior fellow, pointed out that Trump could have withdrawn immediatel­y after taking office but instead gave the council 18 months to make changes.

Haley has been the driving force behind withdrawin­g from the human rights body, unpreceden­ted in the 12-year history of the council. No country has ever dropped out voluntaril­y. Libya was kicked out seven years ago.

Peace plan

The move could reinforce the perception that the Trump administra­tion is seeking to advance Israel’s agenda on the world stage, just as it prepares to unveil its longawaite­d Israeli-Palestinia­n peace plan despite Palestinia­n outrage over the embassy relocation. Trump’s son-inlaw and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, is visiting the Middle East this week as the White House works to lay the groundwork for unveiling the plan.

Israel is the only country in the world whose rights record comes up for discussion at every council session, under “Item 7” on the agenda. Item 7 on “Israel and the Occupied Palestinia­n Territorie­s” has been part of the council’s regular business almost as long as it has existed.

The United States’ current term on the council ends next year. Although the US could have remained a non-voting observer on the council, a US official said it was a “complete withdrawal” and that the United States was resigning its seat “effective immediatel­y.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines