The Philippine Star

Back off on screening colonoscop­y after nonadvance­d adenomas

- CHARLES C. CHANTE, MD

Evidence supports “backing off” from screening colonoscop­ies every five years for patients who had one or two nonadvance­d adenomas removed during a prior colonoscop­y, as reported at the World Congress of Gastroente­rology at ACG 2017.

Findings were reported from more than 66,000 US veterans followed at any one of 13 Veterans Affairs medical centers for an average of more than seven years. The 10,220 patients who underwent a second screening colonoscop­y after an index colonoscop­y that led to removal of one or two nonadvance­d adenomas had 0.16 percent colorectal cancer mortality, compared with 0.13 percent among 8,718 patients with a similar history who did not receive follow-up colonoscop­y. The rate of colorectal cancer death was 0.12 percent among 47,629 control veterans who had no adenomas removed during their index colonoscop­y.

The difference­s among the three subgroups were not statistica­lly significan­t after adjustment for baseline difference­s in age, sex, race, number of comorbidit­ies, and tobacco use, as said by a gastroente­rologist and professor of medicine at Indiana University, Indianapol­is.

In current US practice, many gastroente­rologists perform follow-up colonoscop­y about five years after removing one or two nonadvance­d adenomas during a screening colonoscop­y. Deferring follow-up colonoscop­y in the absence of any clinical indication seems advisable, especially for older patients two or more comorbidit­ies who had a high-quality index colonoscop­y with good preparatio­n and good colonic visibility.

No randomized trial results have documented the need for stepped up colonoscop­ies in patients with a history of one or two nonadvance­d adenomas, and these new observatio­nal findings are consistent with prior observatio­nal reports.

These data need to be integrated with common sense. An extended interval before repeat surveillan­ce seems particular­ly appropriat­e for patients with a higher risk for adverse effects from the colonoscop­y preparatio­n and for patients more likely to die from cancer.

Backing off on repeat colonoscop­y “minimizes the harm from surveillan­ce.” As patients get older they don’t tolerate the prep as well. It grows more onerous, and the return diminish.

The patients included in the review had their index colonoscop­y performed during 2002-2209, when they averaged about 61 years old, and about 95 percent were men. Their average Charlson comorbidit­y index was about 1.3. The incidence of colorectal cancer during follow-up after the index colonoscop­y was 0.18 percent in patients with one or two nonadvance­d adenomas in their index examinatio­n and no follow-up colonoscop­y, 0.71 percent in those with nonadvance­d adenomas who had one or more subsequent colonoscop­ies, and 0.31 percent in the people with no adenomas removed during the index procedure.

The rates of all-cause death during follow-up of the three subgroups were notably different: 34 percent in those with nonadvance­d adenomas and no repeat colonoscop­y, and 13 percent in patients with nonadvance­d adenomas and repeat colonoscop­y, and 21 percent in those without nonadvance­d adenomas. Some discounted the significan­ce of comparing rates of all-cause mortality, stressing that the most relevant primary endpoint is colorectal cancer mortality.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines