The Philippine Star

‘9 M voters skipped party-list section of ballot’

- By JESS DIAZ The STAR. – With Sheila Crisostomo

At least nine million constituen­ts of party-list groups failed to vote in the recent mid-term congressio­nal-local elections, Rep. Alfredo Garbin Jr. of Ako Bicol said yesterday.

“On May 13, the total number of votes cast for 134 partylist groups was 27 million. In the 2016 elections, it was 36 million for almost the same number of organizati­ons. The difference is nine million disenfranc­hised voters. That is a big loss,” he said.

He cited the case of his own group, whose bailiwick is the Bicol region.

“In 2016, Ako Bicol received 1.7 million votes equivalent to three seats in the House of Representa­tives. In this year’s elections, we were credited with almost 700,000 votes fewer. As a result, Ako Bicol’s representa­tion was reduced from three seats to two,” he said.

Garbin said in Bicol, Ako Bicol received 1.1 million votes in 2016 and 700,000 on May 13, or a loss of 400,000 votes.

“Why would we lose votes in our bailiwick?” he asked.

Another party-list lawmaker, Orestes Salon of Agri, said his organizati­on got more than 600,000 votes in 2016, entitling it to two House seats.

“This year, our votes went down drasticall­y to 133,000, not even enough for one seat. We lost even in areas where we are strong. That is impossible,” he said.

Garbin and Salon attributed what they described as “a massive loss of party-list votes” to the decision of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to place the list of 134 participat­ing groups aspiring to represent sectors at the back of the official ballot.

They said people who went to polling precincts on May 13 did not notice or were not told of the listing after they voted for senatorial and local candidates whose names were listed in the front portion of the ballot.

“Voters went home without voting for a party-list group,” Garbin said.

He said in the 2010, 2013 and 2016 elections, party-list participan­ts were listed with senatorial candidates in the front part of the ballot.

Garbin could not explain why returning party-list participan­t ACT-CIS (Anti-Crime and Terrorism Community Involvemen­t and Support) topped the party-list race and won three seats, while newcomers Marino, Ang Probinsyan­o and Probinsyan­o Ako won two seats each.

“I really cannot explain that. We are still puzzled by their performanc­e,” he said.

ACT-CIS is associated with the Tulfo media clan. One of its representa­tives is the wife of one of the Tulfo brothers. It is not clear how they inherited the group, which previously belonged to retired police and military personnel and whose previous representa­tive was ex-police officer Samuel Pagdilao.

Congressme­n have asked the Comelec to justify their decision to list party-list groups at the back of the ballot.

Comelec officials have been asked to bring samples of ballots used in elections since 2010 to a hearing on Tuesday.

Lawmakers have also complained about numerous glitches in the automated system of balloting.

President Duterte has asked the Comelec to terminate its engagement with its automation service provider Smartmatic and to look for another vote-counting scheme that is fraud-free.

Meanwhile, poll watchdog Kontra Daya yesterday described the results of the party-list race as very disappoint­ing, saying that majority of the probable representa­tives come from groups which are bogus in orientatio­n.

Kontra Daya lead convenor Danilo Arao noted the results are not surprising but still very disappoint­ing, as 45 of the 61 nominees of winning party-list groups who may sit at the House of Representa­tives do not really represent the marginaliz­ed sectors they supposedly represent.

“From our assessment, the party-list elections have been severely compromise­d by the rich and the powerful,” he told

Arao added the representa­tives come from groups that either have links with political dynasties or incumbent officials, have special business interests or questionab­le advocacies.

He cited the Duterte Youth party-list group which, he alleged, has taken the bastardiza­tion of the party-list system to another level because of the element of brazeness of former National Youth Commission chairman Ronald Cardema to become its first nominee.

Duterte Youth was among 62 “bogus” groups flagged by Kontra Daya prior to election day. There were 134 groups that participat­ed in the elections.

According to Arao, the situation can still be remedied by the law on party-list system to make sure that its nominees will really be coming from the sectors that they seek to represent.

He also cited the need for the Supreme Court (SC) to revisit its 2013 decision in the Atong Paglaum versus Comelec case.

Arao said this SC decision has become the legal basis for “bogus” party-list groups to run even if they do not really represent the marginaliz­ed sector they are suppose to serve.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines