The Philippine Star

Strike down vagueness of terrorism in law, SC asked

- EVELYN MACAIRAN

Fearing their mass actions and protests would be perceived as acts of terrorism, the multisecto­ral alliance group Sanlakas yesterday asked the Supreme Court to strike down the “vague definition of terrorism” in Republic Act 11479 or the AntiTerror­ism Act of 2020.

Sanlakas president Marie Marguerite filed a 10-page petition for certiorari and prohibitio­n with prayer for temporary restrainin­g order against President Duterte, the Senate and House of Representa­tives.

This is the eighth petition filed before the high court against the newly signed law.

The group asked the Court to issue a certiorari and order to have Section 4 of RA 11479 that defines “terrorism” be stricken down for being null and void.

It argued that the provision violates Article III, Section 4 of the 1987 Constituti­on that states, “No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.”

Sanlakas said Section 4 of RA 11479 is a vague provision that violates the due process right guaranteed in the 1987 Constituti­on. This is aside from claiming that it was signed into law by President Duterte with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdicti­on.

The group also asked the court to command Duterte to desist from enforcing or implementi­ng the provision. And for the Senate and the House to desist from allocating funds by way of budgetary appropriat­ion for the enforcemen­t and implementa­tion of the statute.

“Petitioner Sanlakas now runs to this Supreme Court as a court of last resort to protect it, its members, and the Filipino people from a law that will run roughshod over their rights and freedoms by declaring courageous acts of advocacy, protest, dissent, and mass actions by the Filipino people to be acts of terrorism. As the final bastion of our people’s liberty and freedom, this Honorable Supreme Court now finds itself once again in the historic crossroads to restrain the heavy hands of government and protect the people’s rights,” it said.

Sanlakas explained that since their organizati­on was founded in 1993, it has been an advocate of social, political, economic, cultural and environmen­tal changes in Philippine society, with the objective of improving the living conditions of the marginaliz­ed sectors and creating a just and equitable society.

In the process of this advocacy and its dissent against official government policies and actions, Sanlakas, through its thousands of members, uses mass actions, public rallies and demonstrat­ions, workers’ strikes or stoppage of work, and such other popular mobilizati­ons for protest and dissent, to help empower the people and pressure the government to enact laws and policies favorable to the Filipino masses and marginaliz­ed sectors.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines