The Philippine Star

COA tapped to review Meralco refunds

- By DANESSA RIVERA

The Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) plans to tap the Commission on

Audit (COA) to review the refunds to be made by Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) to its customers.

“The ERC is short of auditors so we are mulling to seek the assistance of the COA to find out if the refunds that Meralco is supposed to have undertaken have already been completed or not,” ERC chairperso­n Agnes Devanadera said in a statement.

“We believe that there must be proper auditing by an independen­t party, and we are confident that the COA is the best entity that could render their evaluation on Meralco’s refund, COA is reliable and unbiased,” she said.

Meralco said it would comply with the ERC as it awaits advisories on the refund.

“We have always and consistent­ly cooperated with the regulator and we shall await any advisory in relation to this,” Meralco spokespers­on Joe Zaldarriag­a said in a text message.

The ERC, in previous years, ordered Meralco to refund the bill deposit, meter deposit, and income tax that it collected from its customers.

The issue on bill deposits has been a recurring issue with distributi­on units (DUs), particular­ly with Meralco as the country’s largest power distributo­r.

Bill deposits collected from residentia­l and non-residentia­l consumers are intended to guarantee the payment of electricit­y bills for new and/or additional service and from disconnect­ed consumers who were previously not subject to bill deposit.

The bill deposit shall be equivalent to the estimated billing for one month based on the load schedule of the consumer to guarantee payment of his bills.

In May 2018, the ombudsman suspended then ERC commission­ers Alfredo Non, Gloria Victoria Yap-Taruc, Josefina Patricia Asirit and Geronimo Sta. Ana for three months for failing to act on the misuse of bill deposits by DUs.

As its basis for the suspension order, the ombudsman said the four commission­ers continuous­ly refrain from strictly implementi­ng rules defining the nature of bill deposits as “mere guarantee in payment of bills” which must be returned upon terminatio­n of the DUs’ service.

Currently, only Asirit remains as a commission­er while the rest have retired.

In April last year, the Makabayan bloc asked the Supreme Court to stop Meralco from collecting bill deposits from its customers.

This as the lawmakers pointed out that it was not allowed under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) and the franchise of Meralco. Under EPIRA, DUs are only allowed to impose distributi­on wheeling charges and connection fees approved by the ERC.

In 2002, the Supreme Court ordered Meralco to refund the income tax it overcharge­d its over three million consumers for several years as it should not be passed on to customers.

Based on the petition of the Energy Regulatory Board (ERB), predecesso­r of the ERC, Meralco charged 18.4 centavos per kilowatt-hour (kwh) instead of 16.7 centavos from 1998 up to the present.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines