The Philippine Star

Amber Heard and the death of #MeToo

- (Conclusion) By MICHELLE GOLDBERG

But Depp needn’t succeed in court to achieve his ends. In a 2016 email to his former agent, Christian Carino, Depp wrote that Heard was “begging for total global humiliatio­n.” Now this televised trial has resulted in an explosion of hatred and derision directed at her. The volatile actress – who at times was violent toward Depp, and who never made good on a promise to donate her entire divorce settlement to charity – is very far from a perfect victim. That made her the perfect object of a #MeToo backlash.

Online, there’s a level of industrial­scale bullying directed at Heard that puts all previous social media pile-ons to shame. Countless videos skewer Heard on TikTok; the ’NSync member Lance Bass joined in the trend of mockingly re-enacting her testimony. But it’s not just the internet. “Believe all women, except Amber Heard,” Chris Rock joked recently. A “Saturday Night Live” sketch last weekend turned one of Depp’s wildest accusation­s against Heard into a skit, treating her as a figure of ridicule and him as a charming scamp.

This doesn’t mean that the case is entirely straightfo­rward. Heard has admitted hitting Depp, and has been recorded insulting and belittling him. The couple’s marital counselor testified that they engaged in “mutual abuse,” saying of Heard, “It was a point of pride to her, if she felt disrespect­ed, to initiate a fight.”

Some domestic violence experts consider mutual abuse a myth, arguing that while both partners in a toxic relationsh­ip can behave terribly, one usually exercises power over the other. But even if you believe that Heard acted inexcusabl­y, the idea that she was the primary aggressor – against a larger man with far more resources who was recorded cursing at her for daring to speak in an “authoritat­ive” way – defies logic.

Indeed, one of the most sensationa­l details from the trial – the one that’s been used to jeer at Heard across every form of media – might just as easily fit into a story of her victimizat­ion. Depp, you may know by now, accused Heard or one of her friends of defecating in her bed as an act of revenge, and his bodyguard said she’d confessed to a prank gone wrong. Heard testified that one of their dogs, incontinen­t since eating Depp’s weed as a puppy, defiled the bed. “It was not really a jovial time, and I don’t think that’s funny, period,” she said.

If she’s telling the truth, one has to marvel at how thoroughly Depp and his team have sullied her name. When Depp testified, the hashtags #AmberTurd and #MePoo shot across the internet. The image of Heard, a woman whose brand is bombshell blond glamor, is now linked, perhaps permanentl­y, to excrement. If she’s not a psychopath, she’s the casualty of a truly sadistic reputation­al hit job.

It’s worth noting that in 2020, Bot Sentinel, a group that tracks online disinforma­tion and harassment, was hired by Heard’s lawyers to analyze the social media campaign against her. “Everyone thinks that any activity against them is bots or whatever,” the group’s founder, Chris Bouzy, told me. But in this case, some of it was – Bouzy estimated that there were 340 “inauthenti­c” Twitter accounts devoted to defaming Heard and amplifying petitions calling for her to be fired from acting and modeling gigs. .

Yet even if trolls and bots helped juice anti-Heard mania, there are obviously plenty of real people participat­ing in it. Some of them are obsessive Depp fans; as Kaitlyn Tiffany wrote in The Atlantic, there’s a history of online communitie­s fixating “on theories that the male objects of their fandom were being manipulate­d and tortured by less-famous, female romantic partners.”

There seems, however, to be a broader misogynist frenzy at work, one characteri­stic of the deeply reactionar­y moment we’re living through. “She will hit the wall hard!!!” Depp wrote in the email to Carino.

Looks like he knew his audience.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines