The Philippine Star

America may be broken beyond repair

- By MICHELLE GOLDBERG The New York Times

In an ad released last year, Blake Masters, a leading candidate in Arizona’s Republican Senate primary, cradles a semiautoma­tic weapon. “This is a short-barreled rifle,” he said, ominous music playing in the background. “It wasn’t designed for hunting. This is designed to kill people.”

For Masters, this isn’t an argument against allowing such guns to proliferat­e. Rather, it’s an acknowledg­ment of why access to these weapons is, for the right, a matter of existentia­l importance. “The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting,” said Masters. “It’s about protecting your family and your country. What’s the first thing the Taliban did when Joe Biden handed them Afghanista­n? They took away people’s guns.” Guns, in this worldview, are a guarantor against government overreach. And government overreach includes attempts to regulate guns.

These days, it’s barely remarkable when Republican­s issue what sound like threats against those who’d dare curtail their private arsenals. “I have news for the embarrassm­ent that claims to be our president – try to take our guns and you’ll learn why the Second Amendment was written in the first place,” Randy Fine, a state representa­tive in Florida, tweeted on Wednesday.

It will be impossible to do anything about guns in this country, at least at a national level, as long as Democrats depend on the cooperatio­n of a party that holds in reserve the possibilit­y of insurrecti­on. The slaughter of children in Texas has done little to alter this dynamic.

Republican­s have no intention of letting Democrats pass even modest measures like strengthen­ed background checks, and as long as the Democratic senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema refuse to amend the filibuster, Republican­s retain a veto over national policy. Victims of our increasing­ly frequent mass shootings are collateral damage in a cold civil war, though some Democrats refuse to acknowledg­e it, let alone fight it.

Fine’s words echoed Donald Trump’s during the 2016 election, when he said that “Second Amendment people” might be able to stop a president Hillary Clinton from appointing Supreme Court justices. What was once a barely concealed insinuatio­n of violence has morphed, especially since Jan. 6, into an even more forthright menace. As ProPublica has reported, dozens of members of the Oath Keepers militia were arrested in connection with the attack on the Capitol, but that hasn’t stopped the organizati­on from “evolving into a force within the Republican Party.”

In Shasta County, a conservati­ve part of rural Northern California, a militia-aligned faction has secured a majority on the board of supervisor­s, in what members of the movement see as a blueprint that can be deployed nationally. Throughout the country, reported The New York Times, “right-wing Republican­s are talking more openly and frequently about the use of force as justifiabl­e in opposition to those who dislodged him” – meaning Trump – “from power.” Expecting those same Republican­s to collaborat­e with Democrats on public safety is madness.

The horrifying irony, the hideous ratchet, is that the more America is besieged by senseless violence, the more the paramilita­ry wing of the American right is strengthen­ed. Gun sales tend to rise after mass shootings. Republican­s responded to the massacre in Uvalde by doubling down on calls to arm teachers and “harden” schools. An article in The Federalist argued that parents must home-school so that kids can learn “in a controlled environmen­t where guns can be safely carried for self-defense or locked away when not in use.” It’s a vision of a society – if you can call it that – where every family is a fortress.

Guns are now the leading cause of death for American children. Many conservati­ves consider this a price worth paying for their version of freedom. Our institutio­ns give these conservati­ves disproport­ionate power whether or not they win elections. The filibuster renders the Senate largely impotent. Trump, a president who lost the popular vote, was able to appoint Supreme Court justices who are poised to help overturn a New York state law restrictin­g the carrying of concealed weapons. It’s increasing­ly hard to see a path to small-d democratic reform.

And so among liberals, there’s an overwhelmi­ng feeling of despair. Even as people learn the names of all those murdered children, the most common sentiment is not “never again,” but a bitter acknowledg­ment that nothing is going to change. America is too sick, too broken. It is perhaps beyond repair.

Two years ago, David French, an antiTrump conservati­ve, published a book, “Divided We Fall,” warning of the possible crackup of the United States. It included two chapters imagining scenarios for how the dissolutio­n of the country might happen. One involved a mass shooting at a school in California, to which the state’s people reacted “with white-hot rage.” French envisioned furious state politician­s defying the Second Amendment, leading to a nullificat­ion crisis and blue-state secession.

He meant it as a cautionary tale, but rereading the chapter after Uvalde, it feels less bleak than our reality. In French’s scenario, atrocity has the effect of energizing people rather than immobilizi­ng them. They are determined to fight, not resigned to defeat. They have audacity and hope.

The real nightmare is not that the repetition of nihilist terrorism brings American politics to an inflection point, but that it doesn’t. The nightmare is that we simply stumble on, helpless as things keep getting worse.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines