Bi­bli­o­gra­fia

OftalPro - - ARTIGO TÉCNICO -

1. Wal­li­ne JJ, et al. Be­ne­fits of con­tact lens we­ar for chil­dren and te­ens. Eye Con­tact Lens. 2007 Nov;33:317-21. 2. Li L, et al. Con­tact len­ses in pe­di­a­trics study in Sin­ga­po­re. Eye Con­tact Lens. 2009 Jul;35(4):18895. 3. Min­tel re­port, 2010 4. Wal­li­ne JJ, et al. A ran­do­mi­zed tri­al of the ef­fect of soft con­tact len­ses on myo­pia pro­gres­si­on in chil­dren. In­vest Ophthal­mol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4702-6. 5. Hor­ner DG, et al. Myo­pia pro­gres­si­on in ado­les­cent we­a­rers of soft con­tact len­ses and spec­ta­cles. Op­tom Vis Sci. 1999 Jul;76(7):474-9. 6. Wag­ner H et al. Age and events that in­ter­rupt

con­tact lens we­ar in youth. ARVO 2010 7. So­ni PS, et al. Will young chil­dren com­ply and fol­low ins­truc­ti­ons to suc­ces­s­fully we­ar soft con­tact len­ses? CLAO J. 1995 Apr;21(2):86-92. 8. Wal­li­ne JJ, et al. Daily dis­po­sa­ble con­tact lens we­ar in myo­pic chil­dren. Op­tom Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;81(4):255-9. 9. Fonn D, et al. The ocu­lar res­pon­se to ex­ten­ded we­ar of a high Dk si­li­co­ne hy­dro­gel con­tact lens. Clin Exp Op­tom. 2002 May;85(3):176-82. 10. Dum­ble­ton KA, et al. Changes in myo­pic re­frac­ti­ve er­ror with ni­ne months’ ex­ten­ded we­ar of hy­dro­gel len­ses with high and low oxy­gen per­me­a­bi­lity. Op­tom Vis Sci. 1999 Dec;76(12):845-9. 11. Wal­li­ne JJ, et al. A ran­do­mi­zed tri­al of the ef­fect of soft con­tact len­ses on myo­pia pro­gres­si­on in chil­dren. In­vest Ophthal­mol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4702-6. 12. Ze­ri F, et al. At­ti­tu­des towards con­tact len­ses: a com­pa­ra­ti­ve study of te­e­na­gers and their pa­rents. Cont Lens An­te­ri­or Eye. 2010 Jun;33(3):119-23. 13. Rah MJ, et al.. Vi­si­on spe­ci­fic qu­a­lity of li­fe of pe­di­a­tric con­tact lens we­a­rers. Op­tom Vis Sci. 2010 Aug;87(8):560-6. 14. Ter­ry RL, et al. Spec­ta­cles, con­tact len­ses, and chil­dren’s self-con­cepts: a lon­gi­tu­di­nal study. Op­tom Vis Sci. 1997 Dec;74(12):1044-8. 15. Wal­li­ne JJ et al. Ran­do­mi­zed tri­al of the ef­fect of con­tact lens we­ar on self-per­cep­ti­on in chil­dren. Op­tom Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;86(3):222-32 16. Me­di­cal Of­fi­cers of Scho­ols As­so­ci­a­ti­on (MOSA).

Eye we­ar 17. in sport. Feb2009. http://www.mosa.org.uk/ Open%20Fol­ders/ Eye_We­ar_in_S­port_­feb06. pdf 17. Horwo­od J, et al. Com­mon vi­su­al de­fects and pe­er vic­ti­mi­za­ti­on in chil­dren. In­vest Ophthal­mol Vis Sci. 2005 Apr;46(4):1177-81. 18. GfK Fit­ting da­ta 2009 - new&lap­sed we­a­rers

analy­sis. 19. Dum­ble­ton K, et al. Pa­ti­ent and prac­ti­ti­o­ner com­pli­an­ce with si­li­co­ne hy­dro­gel and daily dis­po­sa­ble lens re­pla­ce­ment in the Uni­ted Sta­tes. Eye Con­tact Lens. 2009 Jul;35(4):164-71. 20. Wal­li­ne JJ, et al. Con­tact Len­ses in Pe­di­a­trics (CLIP) Study: chair ti­me and ocu­lar he­alth. Op­tom Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;84(9):896-902.

Newspapers in Portuguese

Newspapers from Portugal

© PressReader. All rights reserved.