HBKU’s CIS to collate Prophet’s covenants to help build social harmony
THE College of Islamic Studies (CIS), part of Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), is embarking on a mission to document, collate and index copies the covenants which the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) issued to non-Muslim communities.
The project, which is headed by Ibrahim Zein, professor of the History of Religions at CIS, began in 201 and builds on John Andrew Morrow’s The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World’, a 201 publication which documented treaties granted by the Prophet to Christian communities. Prior to then, no one had collated and translated copies of these covenants, which exist in monasteries and ecclesiastical histories, and made them available to a larger audience.
The book also goes into extensive detail in discussing the covenant of the Prophet at St. Catherine’s Monastery in Mount Sinai which, according to tradition, was frequented by the Prophet in his youth as it was part of the trade routes with Syria and Palestine.
“Christian, Jewish, Zoroastrian and Samaritan traditions have all claimed to have received a covenant of protection from the Prophet,” said Ahmed El-Wakil, a researcher within CIS who is working on the project.
“The covenant that exists in the Monastery of St. Catherine is particularly important because it has been repeatedly attested by Muslim authorities. Though some of the details of the covenants may be disputed, there is nevertheless a certain degree of consistency among the documents issued to different faith communities. This implies that they all originate from a common source and that on the whole they are textually accurate.”
Interfaith Intolerance: As the religion of Islam remains subject to various forms of Islamophobia and counternarratives, it has now become commonplace to accuse Islam of being at its very core an intolerant religion.
According to El-Wakil, while some Muslims indeed may have done unfavourable things in history, it remains important to try and understand the Prophet’s vision in trying to build bridges between people of all faiths. He believes that sufficient grounds can be made in favour of the historicity of the covenants.
“At one point, rejecting these documents was an acceptable argument among academics because scholars were looking at the documents in silos,” noted El-Wakil.
“Now, however, there are not solid academic grounds to make such arguments. How can scholars refute the similarities we find between covenants granted to Jewish, Christian, Zoroastrian and Samaritan communities Even if, for the sake of argument, we assume there was some interaction between them, there is no evidence that they borrowed’ or contrived their respective texts from one another. This would have been an unlikely process for forging these documents.”
Like the majority of the letters and treaties of the Prophet and his Companions, the original covenants have not survived.
“The word authenticity’ is one that many of us can be uncomfortable with. As Professor Zein would put it, authentic’ means that the original document that the Prophet issued exists today in a museum. This clearly is not the case. However, there are a number of tests which we can apply to determine whether the copies we have today are faithful replicas of the original ones,” said El-Wakil.
The covenants reveal the Prophet and the Rightly-Guided Caliphs’ vision in encouraging and respecting interfaith relations.
“The covenants clearly outline that the lives, property, wealth and faith of the non-Muslims are all to be revered. Non-Muslims living in Muslim societies must always be treated with kindness and abusing their rights is a big sin before God. In that regard, the Prophet is frequently quoted to have stated whoever harms a person living under our protection, then I shall be his foe on the Day of Judgment’,” said El-Wakil.
The covenants also outline a framework for taxation (known as jizya), to be only levied according to their capability, prohibiting exploitation and advocating economic justice. Muslims are also to defend non-Muslims and relieve them from participation in wars. Additionally, a Muslim should never force a nonMuslim to embrace Islam.
“If you look at the American Declaration of Independence and how it refers to inalienable rights, you will see that they cannot be revoked under any circumstances. The covenants offer a similar approach, and these documents remain valid until the day of judgement,” El Wakil added.
An Evidence-Based Approach: The research team put rigorous measures in place to ensure that the study and analysis of the covenants should be done using historical and hermeneutical methods.
“We are not here as apologists or acting as publicists for the religion of Islam. We have looked at an array of sources such as various manuscripts, inscriptions, historical references, cross-comparing different texts and identifying echoes of the covenants’ terms and conditions in Islamic texts,” El-Wakil said.
Ultimately, the goal of the project is to provide a comprehensive library for academics, religious leaders and researchers to have all the resources at hand to study the covenants in line with traditional Islamic teachings and jurisprudence.
El-Wakil added, “We have been examining the covenants now for three years. There is still a lot of work to be done, and the more manuscripts become available to us, the more we will know about the origins of the covenants and why they have become obscured. The tradition of securing the rights of non-Muslims living in Muslim societies and promoting tolerance between different faith groups need to be reconstructed and understood. The sentiments expressed in the covenants, especially in a world that is becoming more polarised, are perhaps now needed more than ever.”