Coronavirus May Not Be Able To Mutate Beyond Control
New research suggests that there may be limits to how many tricks the coronavirus has up its sleeve — and that may make it easier for vaccines to keep up
IT’S been about a year since the early coronavirus alarms were raised, and despite a decline in infections, new fears are rising up. New COVID-19 variants are making pessimists worry that an even bigger next wave may be coming. It’s true that the virus is mutating in ways more profound than biologists anticipated last summer. But new research also suggests that there may be limits to how many tricks the coronavirus has up its sleeve and that may make it easier for vaccines to keep up.
If scientists have been somewhat blindsided by the variants, it’s because they hadn’t fully realized the way the coronavirus tends to mutate
in a way that’s distinct from influenza or HIV. This virus has a talent for shape-shifting by dropping pieces of its genetic code.
Early on, a few scientists observed these so-called deletion mutations by studying virus samples from patients with compromised immune systems. Such patients can be crucibles for viral evolution, because the virus survives in their cells for months, making copies of itself all the while.
The mutations that scientists were observing in individual patients were essentially the same as those now seen in the new variants. Molecular biologist Kevin McCarthy of the University of Pittsburgh, who analyzed mutations in immunecompromised patients, found this eye-opening. “Evolution in that patient, in some ways, foreshadowed what the virus was going to do all over the world,” he said.
McCarthy’s group published its findings earlier this month in Science. Another group of researchers published a similar comparison in December in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Last spring and summer, scientists had considered SARS-CoV-2 to be somewhat mutation-averse, because it contains a molecular proofreading mechanism. When a mutated virus replicates, this mechanism corrects it. Human cells and those of other animals have various such proofreading systems to allow them to replicate without too many errors. Influenza viruses and HIV do not which is one reason those viruses continue to evolve too fast for a single vaccine.
However, it turns out that the coronavirus’s proofreader lets one type of mutation through a section of missing genetic code. So the virus is able to eject sections of code and still replicate and still get transmitted to other people.
McCarthy says he came to appreciate this in the early fall when he was asked about some of the deletions found in a patient. “I started looking at all these genomic sequences of SARSCoV-2 that had been deposited from all over the world in a public database,” he said. “And I started finding additional examples.”
The deletions can allow viral proteins to change their shapes in ways that could evade both the proofreading mechanism and the human immune system. That’s what people are worried about, McCarthy explained. The first new variant that made big news the B.1.1.7 variant that spread so fast in the U.K. has two of these deletions.
B.1.1.7’s big advantage seems to be an increased ability to transmit between people. It’s also a basic principle of evolution that the more that humans produce antibodies to a virus because they’ve been infected before or because they’ve been vaccinated the greater will be the advantage for any new variant that can elude those antibodies.
Penn State University evolutionary biologist Andrew Read likens this to the introduction of new predators on an island. The animals already there either die or adapt by growing shells, by climbing or burrowing, or by acquiring the ability to fight back. If the coronavirus develops an antivaccine strategy, we will need a counter strategy.
That could mean upgrading the existing vaccines so that they induce a broader range of antibodies. It also might help to give people different vaccines for their first and second doses an approach that needs to be tested in clinical trials.
McCarthy would like to see more data on the patients who have gotten COVID-19 despite being vaccinated. When were they exposed, and did they have high or low levels of the virus in their bodies This fight requires that all scientists working to understand the virus have all the data they need.
But from what they’ve learned so far, it doesn’t appear that the new variants mean the pandemic will never end. McCarthy thinks SARSCoV-2 may not be able to mutate itself in infinite ways that make it better at infecting people and evading antibodies. So far, scientists have been seeing the same deletions cropping up again and again. “The virus was telling us that it was evolving in a certain way for a certain reason,” he said.
At this point, new changes are appearing independently in different places so-called convergent evolution and it could be that the number of possible changes is limited.
A year ago, some people thought the course of the pandemic could be foretold according to simple formulas. As the complexities of the coronavirus have become apparent, scientists have grown less confident in their predictions. But that also means there’s no reason to assume the pandemic will never go away.
(Faye Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion
columnist and host of the podcast “Follow the Science.” She has written for the Economist, the New York Times, the
Washington Post, Psychology Today, Science and other publications. Listen to
Flam’s “Follow the Science” podcast on coronavirus shape-shifting, available on Spotify, iTunes or wherever
you get your podcasts)