Arab News

Afghan debacle redefines limits of US empire

- ISHTIAQ AHMAD

America has suffered a major blow to its credibilit­y as a global power in the wake of the humiliatin­g withdrawal from Afghanista­n and the Taliban’s swift return to power. Recovery from the Afghan debacle will take some time. Until then, it is difficult to imagine the US resuming liberal interventi­onism in any regional conflict in the near future.

The chaotic withdrawal from Afghanista­n has also led to a bitter public debate inside the US. Amid the ensuing blame game, either the Biden administra­tion is singled out for criticism or the buck is passed on to the erstwhile Afghan allies, President Joe Biden’s predecesso­rs or US military commanders involved in the 20-year war in the country.

Interestin­gly, much of the criticism directed against Biden over the pullout is being levelled by the predatory interests linked to the US military-industrial complex. Their current discourse over the withdrawal, like the previous penchant for interventi­on, reeks of an imperial impulse that seeks US military hegemony under the cloak of liberal democracy and human rights.

While 9/11 provided immediate justificat­ion for waging war against the Taliban, the conflict’s subsequent rationale was built on the portrayal of the Taliban as barbarians, especially in terms of their treatment of women and religious and ethnic minorities. The same discourse has underpinne­d the arguments against US withdrawal.

What is ignored amid the partisan politics and blame game is the decades of imperial hubris, wherein lies the underlying reason for America’s fall from grace. In fact, it is quite unfortunat­e to see a great nation that helped liberate the world from the curses of fascism and communism in the previous century face its most surreal moment of weakness today.

Compare this to the “unipolar moment” of the 1990s, when there was no rival to US power following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Historians such as Niall Ferguson described the American empire then as the greatest in world history in terms of military, political, economic and technologi­cal capability. But it was an empire that claimed the right to rule the world while being in denial of the responsibi­lities that accrued from this right.

This dichotomy has formed the basis of American unilateral­ism throughout the post-Cold War period, spurred initially by Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizati­ons” thesis, Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” claim and the proclamati­on by George Bush Sr. of a “new world order.” Subsequent­ly, this imperial quest was ideologica­lly refined by proponents of the Project for the New American Century, the neoconserv­ative think tank that helped shape the muscular foreign policy of George W. Bush after 9/11.

Since then, Pax Americana, or the US pursuit of “benevolent global hegemony,” has manifested itself in various conflicts, including Iraq, Syria and Libya. However, Afghanista­n is where its unbridled practice became most visible, with the US militaryin­dustrial complex being in the driving seat of an imperial venture.

This fact is establishe­d by the startling revelation­s in the voluminous report of the

US Special Inspector General for Afghanista­n, titled “What We Need to Learn: Lessons from 20 Years of Afghanista­n Reconstruc­tion.” The report draws its conclusion­s from scores of interviews with US military commanders, defense contractor­s, Afghan officials and other personnel involved in Afghan security and reconstruc­tion activities. Craig Whitlock’s recent book “The Afghanista­n Papers” also more or less relies on the same oral history.

The revelation­s about the extent of US deceit and lying during the war in both works are simply mind-boggling: Top US military and civilian leaders consistent­ly hoodwinked the American public into believing that all was well in Afghanista­n. Privately, though, they all believed the war was going haywire. None had any clue about the military strategy or political objective.

Moreover, of the almost $1 trillion spent on the war, less than 2 percent was devoted to Afghan security and reconstruc­tion. The rest was consumed by the Pentagon and the CIA. The SIGAR report lists numerous cases of fraud and corruption by US defense and civilian contractor­s, Afghan warlords and other stakeholde­rs, in which billions of dollars were siphoned off with impunity.

The nexus between the US military-industrial complex and former US commanders who led the Afghan war, such as Gen. David Petraeus and Gen. H.R. McMaster, has been further exposed by US publishers The Intercept and Responsibl­e Statecraft. The fact that the same commanders now sit on the boards of major US defense contractor­s in Afghanista­n is presented as evidence to show why they are so critical of Biden’s decision to withdraw.

As the dust settles on the greatest military misadventu­re in US history, further truths will surely emerge about how the US in Afghanista­n ultimately reaped the whirlwind of the neoconserv­ative imperial impulse.

The course of this war is laced with strategic blunders, which culminated in Donald Trump’s unilateral pact with the Taliban, leaving the Afghan regime and its army at the mercy of this militia. Blaming Biden for the subsequent turn of events, or using the Afghans as scapegoats for US failure, is a rebuke to the thousands who died in the war and the millions left homeless.

Against this backdrop, Biden has done the right thing in taking the US out of Afghanista­n. The Afghan debacle has, in fact, already redefined the limits of the American empire by constraini­ng its hegemonic ambition, at least for the foreseeabl­e future. The US still has all the power attributes that make it exceptiona­l in world history. We can only hope that the Afghan exit will lead to a sustainabl­e US global posture — one that abandons the pursuit of global hegemony in favor of viable collaborat­ion with emerging global powers, such as China and Russia.

These powers, together with regional states, have the greatest stake in Afghan peace and stability. Now that the US has rid itself of what was always an unwinnable war, it is in the country’s pragmatic interest to live in and lead a multipolar world, to collective­ly manage conflicts such as Afghanista­n, as well as tackle the real global challenges that form part of the UN Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals for the future peace and prosperity of humankind.

The Afghan debacle has, in

fact, already redefined the limits of the

American empire by constraini­ng its hegemonic ambition, at least for the foreseeabl­e

future

It remains

unclear how many deserving

British nationals and Afghans

were left without help

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Ishtiaq Ahmad is a former journalist, who has subsequent­ly served as the Vice Chancellor of
Sargodha University in Pakistan and the Quaid-e-Azam Fellow at
the University of Oxford.
Ishtiaq Ahmad is a former journalist, who has subsequent­ly served as the Vice Chancellor of Sargodha University in Pakistan and the Quaid-e-Azam Fellow at the University of Oxford.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Saudi Arabia