Harper's Bazaar (Singapore)

ALL I N THE FEMME

AN INJECTION OF WOMENSWEAR CODES INTO THE REALM OF MENSWEAR IS MAKING THE LATTER CHICER THAN EVER. BY JEFFREY YAN

-

Half a century ago, Yves Saint Laurent created his iconic Le Smoking and changed womenswear forever. The menswearin­spired t u xe d o wa s first a scandal, and then quickly a sensation. Now, his s u cce ss o r, Ant h o ny Vaccarello is channellin­g that contrarian spirit and doing the inverse—applying the language of Saint Laurent’s womenswear into menswear. This meant silk and chiffon blouses, giant pussybows, floor-sweeping coats, and vertiginou­sly heeled boots. For years, Saint Laurent menswear has felt like, if not an afterthoug­ht, then just a commercial continuati­on of the skinny rockgod aesthetic put in place by Hedi Slimane. It wasn’t until Vaccarello tapped into the inherent femininity at the heart of the brand that his menswear finally clicked.

Vaccarello isn’t the only designer who has sensed this shift in the air. The interestin­g thing is that it’s the world’s biggest brands and most establishe­d designers who are keying into this new, more feminine mood for menswear. It’s almost a given that young, indie, and/or queer designers— your Ludovic de Saint Sernin’s and Palomo Spain’s—will push the boundaries of gender and identity in fashion; but big brands, by the very nature of their businesses, which need to appeal to the widest possible audiences, have a tendency to not rock the boat so much. This season, in menswear at least, that has been upended.

At Dior Men, Kim Jones is best known for merging streetwear with high fashion, and for translatin­g Christian Dior’s language of French couture into menswear. For fall/winter 2023, he focused less on the street and more on the couture. His suits were soft and fluid, with gently nipped-in waists, draped lapels and the occasional flowing train. There were skirts and skirt-like shorts. Despite these feminine accents, the collection never read as anything other than menswear. At Fendi, Silvia Venturini Fendi referenced her own youth, spent dancing nights away at Studio 54. This translated into a collection filled with disco-ready oneshoulde­red tops, scarf dressing, and a generous dose of rhinestone­s and crystals. All of it made for one of Fendi’s most interestin­g menswear outings yet.

At Dolce&Gabbana, that bastion of virile Italian masculinit­y, Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana looked to their own repertoire of ultra-precision suiting from the ’ 80s and ’90s, and adapted it for a 2020s context. The duo took their signatures and cinched, sculpted and whittled them into volumes that evoked their sensuous womenswear. As a result, the clothes were the freshest and most fashion-forward they have looked in years. Sarah Burton of Alexander McQueen was inspired by McQueen’s time on Savile Row. Hence, her starting point of razor-sharp tailoring, to which she applied the dissection and subversion that are the House’s core qualities. Some of the suits were fashioned into bustier-like forms; others were sliced open like the cut-out dresses she showed in her women’s collection. At LOEWE, Jonathan Anderson wanted to achieve purity of line. The shapes he showed were reminiscen­t of mid-century couture, but stripped of fuss and stuffiness—and shown on male models—they looked almost radical.

The most electrifyi­ng thing about this new movement is the fact that it doesn’t ignore the old gender binary of yore. It’s not about erasing boundaries completely—the way Alessandro Michele used to do it at Gucci—and putting boys and girls alike in the same flowy dresses. The aforementi­oned collection­s are still very much rooted in the classical codes of menswear—suits and tuxes, and the like. The womenswear touches are subtle—a cowl neck here; a pussybow there. The intention is not to make men look effeminate, but to push the aesthetic limits of what’s often thought of as traditiona­l masculinit­y. There is a reason why most of the models chosen by these designers fit your mental image of a typical hunk. At this point in our cultural moment, you kind of expect a Troye or a Timothée to play around with gendercode­d clothing—it’s a far more powerful visual when you see Bad Bunny in a backless blazer with a flowing floral stole, or Manu Rios in a plunging silk blouse. They still very much look like symbols of manliness, but they also represent a far more tender vision of masculinit­y. And we could all use a little more tenderness.

 ?? ?? 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f n e M r o i D 3
2
0 r e t n i w / ll a f o ll e r a c a V y n o h t n A y b t n e r u a L t n i a S 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f i d n e F
3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f n e M r o i D 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f o ll e r a c a V y n o h t n A y b t n e r u a L t n i a S 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f i d n e F
 ?? ?? 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f i d n e F
3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f i d n e F
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f n e u Q c M r e d n a x e l A 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f n a b a G & e c l o D
3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f n e u Q c M r e d n a x e l A 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f n a b a G & e c l o D
 ?? ?? 3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f i rr a v h C y l il W
3 2 0 r e t n i w / ll a f i rr a v h C y l il W
 ?? ?? Left: Manu Rios in Saint Laurent by Anthony Vaccarello. Right: Bad Bunny in Jacquemus
Left: Manu Rios in Saint Laurent by Anthony Vaccarello. Right: Bad Bunny in Jacquemus
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? 3 2 0 2 r e t n i w / ll a f E W E O L
3 2 0 2 r e t n i w / ll a f E W E O L
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Singapore