The Business Times

Why China’s electric cars are piling up at European ports

- By Jamie Bloomfield The writer is senior lecturer in operations and supply chain management at Anglia Ruskin University

CHINA’S automotive industry has undergone a revolution over the past decade, from producing basic Western clones to making cars that equal the world’s best. As the manufactur­ing powerhouse of the world, China is also producing its cars in huge volumes.

However, Chinese cars are facing difficulti­es in finding buyers in Europe. Imported cars, many of which are Chinese electric vehicles, are piling up at European ports, with some spending up to 18 months in port car parks as manufactur­ers struggle to get them onto people’s driveways instead.

Why is this, though? Chinese electric vehicles, in particular, are getting positive reviews. Having driven them myself, I can attest to them matching, or even exceeding, the well-known European brands in range, quality and technology.

But entering an establishe­d market as a challenger is a complex operation. Chinese makers have to contend with buyer wariness, a lack of brand image, trade protection­ism and rapid outdatedne­ss.

One might draw parallels between China’s automotive expansion programme today and the moves made by Japan in the 1960s and 1970s.

Lack of buyer faith

At that time, Japanese-made cars were commendabl­e but lacked the finesse, design and longevity of their Western counterpar­ts. Japanese cars were thought of as tinny, underpower­ed and susceptibl­e to rusting, as well as looking very generic compared to stylish European designs.

Memories of Japan’s involvemen­t in World War II were also fresh in buyers’ minds, especially those in the US, who were slow to forgive a nation that launched the Pearl Harbor attacks.

However, by constantly focusing on a reliable, relatively cheap and increasing­ly stylish product, Japan slowly turned its fortunes around to become the automotive powerhouse of the 1990s and 2000s.

Today, China is viewed with suspicion by many Westerners, and its carmakers are similarly hampered by their recent legacy of producing both endorsed and illegal clones of European cars. But with the lessons of the Japanese to learn from, Chinese cars are rapidly advancing to match and exceed existing alternativ­es.

Strategic purchases of brands such as Volvo, Lotus and MG have also given China existing brands that are respected and, more importantl­y, have some of the best engineerin­g knowledge in the world.

Yet, even after buying up Western brands, Chinese automakers have proven unable to buy loyalty from existing customers of brands such as BMW, Porsche, Ferrari and Ford. For these buyers, the history of the brand in terms of known reliabilit­y and even things like motor sport success is something that Chinese makers, like the Japanese, will have to build up over time.

It was Ford dealers who, in the 1960s, coined the phrase: “Win on Sunday, sell on Monday”. The phrase attests to how, if buyers see a car winning a race, they’ll be motivated to go out and buy one.

Existing manufactur­ers also have a legacy of reliabilit­y that buyers have experience­d for themselves, giving a huge brand loyalty benefit. Add to this a lack of an establishe­d dealer network outside of China, and one can see why Chinese makers struggle against the establishe­d competitio­n.

China has a price advantage compared to Europe or the US. Economies of scale, excellent shipping links and cheap labour mean that Chinese cars are cheaper both to make and buy. However, in many countries, they are subject to high import tariffs. The European Union (EU) currently imposes a 10 per cent import tariff on each car brought in. In the US, car imports from China are subject to a 27.5 per cent tariff.

These tariffs may well rise further. The EU is conducting an investigat­ion into whether its tariff is too low. If it concludes this later this year, higher duties will be applied retrospect­ively to imported cars.

Upgrades and updates

Cars, and specifical­ly electric vehicles, are also in a phase of their developmen­t where they see rapid changes and updates. Traditiona­lly, vehicle models have a market life of between four and seven years, perhaps with small updates in trim, colour palette or feature availabili­ty.

But Tesla has turned this on its head. The Tesla Model S, for example, has seen almost continuous product updates that make it barely recognisab­le in terms of hardware from the first such car released in 2012.

Chinese automakers have taken note. They are bringing out new models around 30 per cent faster than in most other nations.

However, Tesla is supporting owners of older cars with upgrades, at extra expense, to bring them in line with the latest hardware. Without such guaranteed software support, the rate at which Chinese automakers are bringing out new models could make buyers wary that their purchases will soon become outdated, compared to buying a car on a more traditiona­l update cycle.

Many of these problems can be fixed. They are also more relevant to private buyers than business buyers, as the latter are more concerned with cost. Chinese makers would be well-advised to push harder into this market.

In the UK, the fleet market dwarfs the private market, and the situation is similar in Europe. Selling en masse to fleets and rental companies gets more cars on the road and allows more data about reliabilit­y to feed into the market.

The road to succeeding in a new market such as the EU will be slow and bumpy, but it’s clear that China is laser-focused on its global push. What remains to be seen is whether this lack of continenta­l buyers can be turned around.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Singapore