African Pilot

Air Force One VS Putin Force One

-

Stakes were high as Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin met in Geneva in June 2021. The meeting may have not resolved internatio­nal tensions, but at the very least it provided a chance for both the United States and Russia to affirm their positions and convince their allies of their firm intentions.

Showing off is an important part of such meetings and both countries certainly have a knack for demonstrat­ing their perceived might through whatever means possible. The airplanes with which presidents arrived are among such means. Massive four-engined beasts of both presidents are some of the largest passenger aircraft in the world and are a demonstrat­ion of the very best both countries’ aviation industry can offer. Of course, it is impossible to say which aircraft is more impressive. The impression is a subjective thing. But it is possible to compare them: lay out the facts and allow everybody to formulate an opinion of their own. So, what are those facts?

The first impression

Arguably, the US Air Force One is the best-known aircraft ever and while technicall­y any US Air Force aircraft carrying the country’s president gets assigned the Air Force One callsign, everybody knows that Air Force One, the iconic Boeing VC-25, a deeply modified 747-200 which has flown American presidents since the early 90s. With the livery created by a famous industrial designer Raymond Loewy and an interior by Nancy Reagan, the aircraft became an icon through scores of presidenti­al visits all over the world, as well as its depictions in Hollywood films. Donald Trump’s attempts to change the livery were met with harsh criticism and it appears that American presidents are destined to travel with this iconic look for decades to come. There are two VC-25s in existence and they always travel in pairs just in case there is a problem with one of them. The presidenti­al seal on its door is a prominent part of every picture of the American head of state arriving in any country, as is the sight of the monstrous airplane landing.

The Russian counterpar­t is much less known, yet quite often gathers attention from aviation enthusiast­s, nonetheles­s. Following the American fashion, any aircraft carrying the Russian president is assigned a callsign ‘Plane No. 1’. Normally that aircraft belongs to the Special Flight Detachment ‘Rossiya’, which is subservien­t to the Directorat­e of the President of the Russian Federation. The detachment has more than 65 aircraft, from helicopter­s to business jets to long-range airliners and is tasked with transporti­ng Russian government­al officials. The crown jewels of its fleet are, of course, the five Ilyushin Il-96-300PU wide-body aircraft. The newest of them was introduced in April 2021, while the oldest one dates to the 90s.

According to some sources, all five aircraft are being readied every time Putin prepares to travel somewhere and the president chooses the plane he intends to fly on at random. This story may not be correct, but just as with VC-25s, Il-94-300PUs also travel in pairs to avoid stranding Putin in case of an emergency. This did not always work though: the plane became notorious due to its mechanical failures and broke down on numerous occasions. In 2005, as Putin was visiting Finland, the braking system malfunctio­ned during the take-off. The president had to continue the journey home on a backup Il-62.

The livery of the Russian presidenti­al aircraft, while not as iconic, is a piece of history too. In the past, the Special Flight Detachment ‘Rossiya’ was a part of the airline Rossiya and bore its livery, all-white with a strip of the Russian flag. In 2009, the detachment was transferre­d to the presidenti­al directorat­e and became independen­t from the airline. In 2018, the airline updated its livery while the detachment’s aircraft remained the same.

The models

By modern standards, both presidenti­al aircraft are dinosaurs. The Boeing 747 dates to the 60s, while the 747-200B, on which the VC-25 is based, was introduced in 1971. It has many features of newer aircraft, including CF6-80C2 engines (also used in the 747-400) and a glass cockpit and has been constantly upgraded through its three-decades-long career.

The Ilyushin Il-96-300PU is, in many aspects, a relic of the Soviet Union. It is based on the Il-96 airliner, itself an upgrade of the Il-86, the first soviet wide-body developed in the early 70s. The Il-96 was introduced in the late 80s and featured many improvemen­ts; neverthele­ss, its life was short: manufactur­ed in small quantities and plagued by technical problems, the aircraft was not utilised by Russian airlines.

The Russian government and military remain the most avid operators of this model and are the only ones who will fly the Il-96-400M: the much-advertised but ultimately unsuccessf­ul next iteration of the aircraft.

The most striking feature of both aircraft is, of course, their size. Both are four-engine wide-body planes that would often find themselves as the largest in almost any airport. The Russian aircraft has a slightly larger wingspan (60.11 m / 197 ft 3 in vs VC-25’s 59.9 m / 196 ft 8 in), but the American one is significan­tly longer (70.66 m / 231 ft 10 in vs Il-96’s 55.3m/181ft7in).Inaddition,the747ishe­avier,itsmaximum­take-offweight(MTOW) being greater by almost 60 tons; its engines also produce almost 60% more thrust. All of this results in the VC-25 being much roomier than the Russian counterpar­t and being able to carry much more equipment, amenities and personnel.

Other specificat­ions of both aircraft cannot be confirmed and are mostly a subject of speculatio­n. They most likely have similar cruise speed and service ceiling; the rumoured range of the Russian aircraft – 14,800 kilometres (9,196 miles) is larger than that of the VC-25 (12,600 kilometres / 7,800 miles), but the VC-25 has a provision for aerial refuelling, which can extend its range many times over, as long as an aerial tanker is nearby. Whilst outwardly both airplanes resemble the models they are based on, the insides are very far from their commercial counterpar­ts.

The most peculiar feature, of course, is the defensive equipment both aircraft carry. For obvious reasons, nothing specific is known about it, but as per available informatio­n, both aircraft have heavy shielding and can withstand radiation from a nuclear blast; they are also equipped with electronic warfare suites that can jam communicat­ions and confuse antiaircra­ft weaponry, whilst they carry flare and chaff dispensers to lure away incoming missiles. Another noteworthy feature is the communicat­ions equipment. Both the VC-25 and the Il-94-300PU are designed to serve as mobile command posts, allowing their respective presidents to keep in touch with the government­s and, if need be, wage nuclear war while in flight. Famously, there is twice more wiring on the VC-25 than on a regular 747-200; while the length of the Il-96-300PU’s wires is not known, the ‘PU’ in its name stands for ‘punkt upravleniy­a’ or ‘command post’. One can only hope that the military capability of both planes is never going to be employed. Meanwhile, the routine operation of presidenti­al aircraft rests on their other capabiliti­es.

According to available informatio­n, Putin’s plane contains a gym, a bedroom with a kingsized bed, a 10-square-meters (108 sq. feet) office and a conference room with nine seats. The VC-25 has a gym as well, but its office space is considerab­ly bigger: the whole front of the aircraft is dubbed ‘the White House’ and contains a meeting room, a dining room and a communicat­ions room, each of them – judging from photos, larger than Putin’s conference room. The rest of the American aircraft is dedicated to staff quarters and offices. It appears that a much bigger part of the Il-96-300PU is dedicated to personal and living space. The Russian aircraft is also much more luxurious: its gold-and-gems-adorned interior, designed by Russian artist Ivan Glazunov, is nothing but lavish in comparison with Nancy Reagan’s strict, 80s-office-like look of the VC-25.

There is one aspect of luxury in which the Russian aircraft sorely lacks though: the VC-25 famously carries a provision for 3000 meals and a full-fledged kitchen. The Il-96-300PU has a kitchen as well, but it packs only pre-made meals to be reheated by flight attendants. Reportedly, on more occasions than one Putin was dissatisfi­ed with the quality and variety of meals served on his airplane, saying that he is being forced to eat ‘the same food again’.

The price

The one aspect in which the presidenti­al planes of the US and Russia differ the most is their cost. American taxpayers paid $325 million for each VC-25 in the early 80s, over $1 billion in today’s money. It also costs $210,877 per hour to operate (like a half-a-squadron of F-35s), not including costly upgrades and refurbishm­ents that it undergoes constantly. The price estimates of Putin’s plane vary wildly. According to some reports, the cost of the new Il-96-300PU introduced in 2021 was $70 million; others put it as high as $550 million. The higher estimate may be more likely to be closer to the truth, but there is no way to know the real price of the jet. Also, quite surely, a large part of the money was dedicated to the luxurious interior of the plane, its equipment and systems being significan­tly cheaper than those on the VC-25.

There is also the controvers­y with the VC-25B – the new American presidenti­al plane based on the Boeing 747-8i, which is supposed to replace the current one by 2024. Boeing faced delays and cost overruns, bloating the initial contract price of almost $2 billion-per-plane to yet unknown size. It is quite clear that the cost of the new VC-25 will put Putin’s Il-96 to shame and it will not even feature golden decoration­s and antique tapestries in its interior.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa