Certain benefits may be left behind
Employers not keen to pay bonuses to those no longer employed
AWARDING bonuses to employees reminds deserving individuals of their value to the employer and strengthens the trust and loyalty in an employment relationship. As the name suggests, the intention of retention bonuses is also to retain employees in the services of the employer.
It follows then that such a gratuity should in principle not be afforded to employees who, by their own choice or otherwise, no longer intend to work for the employer.
The Labour Appeal Court in the case of Apollo Tyres SA (Pty) Ltd v CCMA & Others , defined benefits as “existing advantages or privileges to which an employee is entitled as a right or granted in terms of a policy or practice subject to the employer’s discretion”. The decision gave employees the opportunity to refer unfair labour practices to the CCMA where the employer failed to award such bonuses, even on the basis of predetermined performance management systems, exposing employers to a potential spike in unfair labour practice disputes.
Are employees entitled to reten- tion bonuses after they tender their resignation?
Resignation is a unilateral act by an employee which only needs to be communicated in a clear and unambiguous manner. In Uthingo Management (Pty) Ltd v Shear NO & Others (2009) the Labour Court made it clear that an employer need not accept the resignation for it to become effective. In addition, while an employer may hold the employee to the notice period, it is acceptable for the employer to terminate the employment immediately and make a payment in lieu of the notice period.
The Labour Appeal Court also had opportunity to consider contractual terms relating to termination of employment in the recent case of Bonfiglioli South Africa (Pty) Limited v Panaino . In this matter the employee had signed an extension to a retention and restraint agreement.
In this extension the employer inserted a clause which expressly made the bonus payable subject to the employee remaining in the employ of the company until a specified date. The parties agreed that, for the purpose of the contract, termination included the employee tendering his resignation (as opposed to remaining in the employ of the employer until the end of the notice period, the normal position). The Labour Appeal Court agreed that the employee’s contract terminated when the employee tendered his resignation, as agreed in the contract. The court held further that an employer could make a retention bond payable at the end of a specified period with the intention of incentivising employees to stay in its employ for a period, and that those who resigned before such period would not be entitled to it.
In a scenario where a company bonus is payable at the end of December provided that an employee is still employed at such date, and the employee tenders his resignation at the end of November, ordinarily the employee should serve the notice period and continue to work until the end of December, and thus be entitled to the benefit.
The parties could, however, agree to a different dispensation whereby the employee is no longer entitled to certain rights (such as a retention bonus) whenever the employee tenders her resignation.
Employers may consider inserting a clause in all of their employment contracts making payment of retention bonuses subject to employment at the time that the bonus is due in order to safeguard themselves against unnecessary payment of bonuses to people who are no longer in their employ.
Incorporating a clause that dis- qualifies employees from such a payment upon tendering resignation could assist employers to reward those employees who are in active employ at the cut-off date.
ALL IN THE TIMING Employers may consider inserting a clause in employment contracts making payment of retention bonuses subject to employment at the time that the bonus is due