Business Day

Labour law changes will increase union rivalry — experts

- NATASHA MARRIAN Deputy Political Editor marriann@bdfm.co.za

PROPOSED amendments to SA’s labour laws on organisati­onal rights could result in increased rivalry among unions and a “proliferat­ion of unions”, analysts said yesterday.

A bitter rivalry over organisati­onal rights between the National Union of Mineworker­s ( NUM) and the Associatio­n of Mineworker­s and Constructi­on Union (Amcu) resulted in wildcat strikes at Impala Platinum Mine in Rustenburg, legal action and millions of rand in lost production.

The legislatio­n — at present before Parliament — aims to facilitate the granting of organisati­onal rights to unions that are “sufficient­ly representa­tive”. Current legislatio­n allows for organisati­onal rights to majority unions, with representa­tion of 50% plus 1, and entitles them to access, subscripti­ons, leave for trade union work, shop stewards and disclosure of informatio­n.

Unions can be deemed “sufficient­ly representa­tive” by the Commission for Conciliati­on, Mediation and Arbitratio­n (CCMA) even if their membership stands below 50%. They are afforded limited rights of access, the deduction of subscripti­ons and leave for union work.

The amendments propose that unions below the 50% threshold now be afforded all the rights of majority unions in the absence of a majority union, said Eversheds head of employment law Imraan Mahomed.

This would bode well for unions such as Amcu, which claims to be making headway even in mines that had not been organised by the dominant NUM. Amcu general secretary Jeff Mphahlele said this would benefit his union enormously, as employers had previously “hidden” behind the 50%-plus-1 stipulatio­n in the Labour Relations Act.

“There would be a great improvemen­t ... this will be a compelling factor, to ensure that any member obtains access. Unions like ours would benefit greatly,” he said.

Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) parliament­ary officer Prikashnee Govender said the amendment was an “important advance” as it “addressed the technical restrictio­ns which blocked union access”. The provision was not automatic, she said, as the CCMA commission­er would have discretion over the granting of rights.

Labour economist Andrew Levy said many larger unions, such as the NUM, were “shielded from competitio­n” by the current legislatio­n.

Now smaller unions would be able to gain a foothold — which could lead to increased union rivalry once these unions had establishe­d themselves, he said.

Mr Mahomed said the laws would worsen problems in the workplace. “The amendments will in my view dilute the existing principle of majoritari­anism we have in place and open the door to more union rivalry,” he said.

Federation of Unions of SA (Fedusa) general secretary Dennis George said the proposed legislatio­n increased “worker democracy”, whereby employees could have a say even if their unions did not make the cut to qualify as a majority union.

The amendments also opened the door for unions to club together to obtain representa­tion.

He believed it would counter the principle of “majoritari­anism”.

South African Chamber of Commerce and Industry CE Neren Rau said the extension of organisati­onal rights was a concern, particular­ly for small and medium-size enterprise­s, as it would make the process of engaging with labour more complex.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa