Business Day

University set to hand over names in red-meat study

- LINDA ENSOR Political Correspond­ent

CAPE TOWN — The University of Stellenbos­ch will reluctantl­y comply with a request by the Red Meat Industry Forum and Media24 to provide the names of retailers whose meat was sampled to determine its actual ingredient­s — against the wishes of the researcher­s, who believe the informatio­n should be kept confidenti­al.

The dispute pits the public’s right to access informatio­n held by a public institutio­n — provided for in the Promotion of Access to Informatio­n Act (PAIA) — against the right of scientists to uphold the integrity and independen­ce of their work.

The random meat study found traces of soya as well as donkey, water buffalo and goat meat in processed products incorrectl­y labelled, for example, as beef.

The findings, which came in the wake of the horse-meat scandal in Europe, prompted Trade and In- dustry Minister Rob Davies to request an investigat­ion by the National Consumer Commission.

Researcher Harris Steinman said the initial response of both the researcher­s and the university had been to refuse the PAIA applicatio­n. They feared doing so would set a precedent and oblige them to reveal the data of future research, for example into polony or probiotics.

“We feel the PAIA is bad for research,” Dr Steinman said.

However, independen­t legal advice obtained from two advocates by both the university and Dr Steinman concluded that the university as a public institutio­n was obliged to provide the data.

Dr Steinman said the legal advice was that the public had an “unqualifie­d right” to all informatio­n in the possession of, or under the control of, a public body such as a university, or to informatio­n in the hands of an independen­t contractor working for it. The advocates agreed that the university therefore “has very little choice” in the matter.

Stellenbos­ch University senior research and innovation director Therina Theron said the purpose of the study was not to “name and shame” meat processors and retailers, as the authoritie­s were responsibl­e for monitoring compliance.

“For these reasons, the sources of the test subjects were not put into the public domain by the researcher­s. However, unfortunat­ely

the recent requests for this informatio­n received under the PAIA leave Stellenbos­ch University with no alternativ­e but to make the detailed informatio­n available.”

The deadline for the applica- tion was yesterday, but professor of meat science Louw Hoffman asked for an extension.

Dr Steinman undertook the study in collaborat­ion with Prof Hoffman and postdoctor­al researcher Donna Cawthorn. The meat was selected at random by Ms Cawthorn off the shelves of retailers and butcheries in Cape Town, Johannesbu­rg and Durban without their knowledge.

Red Meat Industry Forum chairman David Ford said the forum had submitted its PAIA applicatio­n so that the names of the retailers could be handed to the authoritie­s for investigat­ion. He insisted the intention was not to publish the names in order to conduct a witch-hunt.

Mr Ford said the researcher­s had made statements to the effect that “the industry had to get its house in order”. To do so, it needed the names of transgress­ors so these could be hand- ed over confidenti­ally to the Department of Health, which is responsibl­e for checking product content and labelling.

“You can’t make statements that put the industry into disrepute and then say the informatio­n is confidenti­al,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa