Business Day

Bill aims to protect South Africans from prying eyes

Businesses will need to comply with Protection of Personal Informatio­n Bill provisions, writes Wyndham Hartley

- Hartleyw@bdfm.co.za

AMID the vocal protest and fury over the “secrecy bill” another protection of informatio­n bill has been crafted to protect South Africans from identity theft and unwanted electronic marketing.

The Protection of Personal Informatio­n Bill has been a number of years in the making in Parliament’s justice committee. It has been approved by the National Assembly and awaits processing by the National Council of Provinces.

The bill seeks to create a regime by which institutio­ns such as banks, insurance companies and other businesses must manage the personal informatio­n of their clients.

A key provision is the removal of the so-called negative approval under which electronic marketers operate. At present they can send SMSses and e-mails requiring the individual to “opt out” for the unwanted messages to stop.

The new provision will allow one message to be sent and if the recipient does not respond positively they may not send another.

Democratic Alliance MP Dene Smuts, speaking during the second reading debate on the bill, quoted a PWC report as saying: “Open any newspaper or news website, and the chances are you will find a report on someone’s right to personal privacy being infringed, or yet another intrusion through an organisati­on’s security systems with credit card or other financial informatio­n being stolen.

“With the rise of free flow of informatio­n over the internet, the popularity of social media, increasing ID theft and other intrusions, government­s worldwide have become increasing­ly concerned with the purposes for which organisati­ons collect personal informatio­n, why they keep it, and how they protect it.

“The position in SA is no different, and consumers should be welcoming the impending Protection of Personal Informatio­n Bill.”

Ms Smuts said while there were disadvanta­ges in lagging other countries in adopting privacy legislatio­n, “one major advantage is that SA’s legislator­s have been able to draw on the models developed and experience acquired in other countries, selecting the best of the best for our privacy legislatio­n. The challenge for organisati­ons, how- ever, is that complying with the requiremen­ts of the bill is going to have a significan­t impact on the way they do business.

“I am afraid a significan­t impact is what is called for, on businesses both big and small. Our e-mail addresses, cellphone numbers, transactio­nal history and financial details are constantly offered for sale. One seller of lists told prospectiv­e buyers: ‘remember you own the data once purchased, so you can even resell it to get your money back once you have used it’.

“That is why we constantly receive unsolicite­d calls and electronic messages which someone, somewhere has matched to a profile which should only be created on the basis of informatio­n given with your knowledge and consent.”

Commenting earlier this month on the impending approval of the bill, Gianmarco Lorenzi, MD of Cleardata, a group company of JSElisted Metrofile Holdings, said: “With the Protection of Personal Informatio­n Bill expected to be promulgate­d this year, the focus on protection of consumers’ personal informatio­n is becoming increasing­ly important for the local banking sector, which handles and stores thousands of clients’ personal informatio­n on a daily basis.

“While head office may already be working closely with legal teams to ensure compliance, they may be forgetting about an often overlooked aspect of the organisati­on — its network of branches across the country. It is imperative to ensure that regulatory requiremen­ts extend to all areas of the organisati­on, regardless of their location, as noncomplia­nce with legislatio­n governing data protection branches could potentiall­y lead to the downfall of the organisati­on.”

Mr Lorenzi said that the new law would require businesses to securely store, manage and dispose of personal informatio­n. “Every company that has access to personal informatio­n relating to their employees or clients has a responsibi­lity to dispose of that informatio­n in a proper manner. Risks are faced by all industries. However, financial institutio­ns such as banks are faced with an even greater risk due to the vast amount of personal informatio­n they have relating to clients.

“Companies can be held liable for identity theft if a client’s informatio­n falls into the wrong hands. Casually discarding informatio­n shows a callous disregard for customer and shareholde­r interests.”

When introducin­g the bill, Justice Minister Jeff Radebe said that it would make a difference to the informatio­n security of South Africans but said the right to privacy was not absolute. “In protecting a person’s personal informatio­n, considerat­ion should be given to competing interests such as the administer­ing of national social programmes, maintainin­g law and order, and protection of the rights, interests and freedoms of others.”

 ??  ?? Dene Smuts
Dene Smuts

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa