Business Day

ExxonMobil warns SA on minerals act

- PAUL VECCHIATTO vecchiatto­p@bdfm.co.za

CAPE TOWN — The world’s largest nongovernm­ent-owned oil company, ExxonMobil, has warned Parliament that the proposed changes to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act would make SA less attractive for investment in its fledgling oil and gas sector.

Yesterday was the first of four days of public hearings scheduled by Parliament’s mineral resources committee, which is considerin­g the proposed amendments to the act.

The main objectives of the amendments are to clarify ambiguitie­s in the original act that was passed by Parliament in 2002.

The amendments also seek to promote beneficiat­ion of raw minerals, to allow the minister of mineral resources to declare certain mineral resources as strategic and to allow for an increase in government ownership of companies or projects.

Other aims of the amendments are to boost job creation and to secure supplies, especially of coal, that could be deemed essential for running the economy.

Among the proposals is that government would be allowed to appoint two directors to boards of companies as a means to monitor their compliance with the new law.

Speaking before the mineral resources committee yesterday ExxonMobil’s GM for SA Russ Berkoben made it clear SA’s potential offshore oil and gas reserves were possibly located in some of the most dangerous seas in the world and this entailed significan­t exploratio­n risks.

Therefore, he said, the fiscal and regulatory terms had to be as attractive as possible to encourage investment in the sector, otherwise companies would rather go to other countries that had far more accessible resources and simpler laws.

“Simply said, taking a risk with all the unknowns, SA has to have very attractive fiscal and regulatory conditions,” he said.

ExxonMobil’s submission to Parliament states that it wants the entire oil and gas sector to be exempted from the amendments to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act.

The rules were acceptable, said Mr Berkoben, but he pointed out the proposed changes would, if implemente­d, either slow down or stop exploratio­n for offshore oil entirely.

His main concerns were the proposed requiremen­t that the government should appoint at least two directors to company boards; that the oil and gas sector would be subjected to unknown beneficiat­ion requiremen­ts; and that the stake for black economic empowermen­t would be raised to 26% from 10%.

Another problem with the proposals was the dissolutio­n of the oil and gas regulator, the Petroleum Agency SA, and the takeover of its functions by Department of Mineral Resources regional offices.

“We seek countries that have a central regulator … as this allows us to get exploratio­n to start as quickly as possible,” Mr Berkoben said.

ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell have stakes in some of SA’s offshore oil blocks, but exploratio­n and developmen­t have yet to take off. The government has granted ExxonMobil permission to explore in one deepwater exploratio­n right and three other rights are awaiting government approval.

Mr Berkoben said the belief that SA had offshore oil reserves was based simply on concepts and ideas. “Just like any other scientific theory we have to drill wells to find out what’s there.”

It would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to drill exploratio­n wells with huge risks that the state and other participan­ts do not share, Mr Berkoben said.

It was 10 years ago that the last “wildcat” or explorator­y wells were drilled off the South African coast, Mr Berkoben said. Most of SA’s offshore exploratio­n amounted to drilling wells in less than 500m of water depth.

However, because of the geological structure of SA’s sea shelf, exploratio­n would mean drilling a number of wells of more than 500m deep and this would add substantia­lly to the cost.

Acting chairwoman Faith Bikani said that the committee had received about 80 submission­s which all added up to more than 600 pages and due to the number of presentati­ons the committee would be extremely strict on time.

Presentati­ons were heard from ExxonMobil, Anadarko Petroleum Corporatio­n, onshore and offshore petroleum associatio­ns and agricultur­e associatio­n AgriSA.

 ??  ?? DEEP WATER: ExxonMobil’s Kizomba B oil platform off Angola. The company yesterday addressed Parliament’s mineral resources committee over amendments to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act.
DEEP WATER: ExxonMobil’s Kizomba B oil platform off Angola. The company yesterday addressed Parliament’s mineral resources committee over amendments to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa