Business Day

Samsung says battery caused Galaxy Note 7 fires

- Agency Staff Seoul /AFP

The world’s biggest smartphone maker Samsung blamed faulty batteries on Monday for the fires that hit its flagship Galaxy Note 7 device last year, as it sought to draw a line under the humiliatin­g recall.

Samsung Electronic­s was forced to discontinu­e the smartphone, originally intended to compete with Apple’s iPhone, after a chaotic recall that saw replacemen­t devices also catching fire.

The debacle cost the South Korean company billions in lost profit and reputation­al damage, during a torrid period when it has also been embroiled in a corruption scandal that has seen the country’s President Park Geun-Hye impeached.

Internal and independen­t investigat­ions “concluded that batteries were found to be the cause of the Note 7 incidents”, Samsung said.

“We sincerely apologise for the discomfort and concern we have caused to our customers,” said Koh Dong-Jin, the head of its mobile business, bowing before hundreds of reporters and cameramen at a media conference.

Samsung Electronic­s is the most prominent unit of the giant Samsung group, South Korea’s largest conglomera­te with a revenue equivalent to about a fifth of the country’s GDP.

It announced a recall of the oversized Galaxy Note 7 in September 2016 after several devices exploded or caught fire, with the company blaming batteries from a supplier.

When replacemen­t phones — with batteries from another company — also started to combust, the company decided to kill off the Note 7 for good.

In total 3.1-million devices were recalled as authoritie­s in the US and elsewhere banned the device from use on planes and even from being placed in checked luggage.

Analysts said Samsung was looking to move on through the announceme­nt, which did not implicate other devices.

“Consumers tend to be forgiving the first time,” said Tom Kang, research director at Counterpoi­nt Technology. “But if it happens again, it will leave a lasting mark on the brand.”

Samsung had concentrat­ed on innovative design, thinness and battery capacity rather than safety, he said.

The company’s next model, the Galaxy S8, had been expected to be unveiled at next month’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.

However, Koh said it would be delayed to ensure it had no safety problems.

Samsung said it had deployed about 700 researcher­s and engineers on its investigat­ion, testing more than 200,000 fully assembled devices and more than 30,000 batteries.

It did not identify the battery makers on Monday, but independen­t investigat­ors UL and Exponent agreed with the findings. One of the defective batteries had a design flaw that pushed down its right corner, while the other had faulty internal welds, said Kevin White, principal scientist at Exponent.

About 1,000 different parts from 450 suppliers are needed for each Galaxy Note 7.

But Koh dismissed the possibilit­y of suing the manufactur­ers. “Whatever parts we use, the overall responsibi­lity falls to us for failing to verify its safety and quality,” he said.

Samsung also acknowledg­ed that it had provided the battery specificat­ions.

“We have taken several corrective actions to ensure this never happens again.

“The lessons of the past several months are now deeply reflected in our processes and in our culture.”

Sister company Samsung SDI confirmed it was one of the battery makers, saying in a statement, it had mounted its own investigat­ion into the units and now had “a more thorough verificati­on process”.

Samsung Electronic­s is set to announce fourth-quarter and full-year results on Tuesday and has estimated the cost of the recall at $5.3bn.

BUT IF IT HAPPENS AGAIN, IT WILL LEAVE A LASTING MARK ON SAMSUNG’S QUALITY AND BRAND IMAGE

 ?? /Reuters ?? Fiery faults: Customers try out Samsung’s Galaxy Note 7 at the company's headquarte­rs in Seoul, South Korea, in 2016.
/Reuters Fiery faults: Customers try out Samsung’s Galaxy Note 7 at the company's headquarte­rs in Seoul, South Korea, in 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa