Business Day

AB may well have lost the plot

- Telford Vice Canterbury /TimesLIVE

Perspectiv­e is more valuable to a cricket team than runs and wickets‚ and doubly so when players are forced out of their comfort zone — which has happened to SA in England.

As if a disappoint­ing one-day series was not bad enough‚ SA crashed out of the Champions Trophy in a fashion remarkable even for them and their torrid tournament history.

Then followed a shocker in the first T20 in Southampto­n on Wednesday when they dawdled to a total of 142/3‚ which England bettered with nine wickets standing and 5.3 overs to spare.

Even considerin­g the format and the visitors’ line-up‚ which was drawn from an experiment­al squad‚ that is a hiding.

The teams meet again in Taunton on Friday and in Cardiff on Sunday.

Only then will we reach the main course of the English summer: the Test series.

Right now that is a foreboding thought‚ and less because of the way SA are playing — poor though that is — than the way they seem to be thinking.

“I know it doesn’t look like it losing by five-odd overs‚ but they had the freedom of going after us because they had wickets in hand and we had a low total. It would have been a different game if we had got 20odd more [runs]‚” AB de Villiers told reporters after the Southampto­n saga.

“From the 12th‚ 13th over we tried to go. We honestly had the intent to take it to them.

“I told Farhaan [Behardien] about 10 an over and we end up getting fives and sixes at times.

“That’s just the nature of the wicket and the plans they had in place,” De Villiers said, talking about the unbroken stand of 110 he shared with Behardien.

SA’s captain made an unbeaten 65 and his partner 64 not out in the 15.5 overs they were together, sharing their team’s record partnershi­p for the fourth wicket.

All of which means nothing in the context of the side’s awful performanc­e‚ which went awry and stayed that way after they lost Jon-Jon Smuts‚ Reeza Hendricks and David Miller inside the first five overs with only 32 runs scored.

For AB to claim the game would have been different had SA made “20-odd” more runs tells us he is losing perspectiv­e.

To say a dressing room would be better off without him would have looked stupid not long ago. Now it is obvious.

De Villiers will bid his teammates so long after Sunday’s game because he has chosen not to play in the Test series.

There is a relief. But the rot does not stop there.

SA have not been the team they should be since their arrival in England.

Whether that is the fault of someone as senior and integral to the cause as De Villiers picking and choosing which games he will play‚ or his wooden captaincy‚ or whether the lame duck status of Russell Domingo is the problem‚ SA are a better team than they have been on this tour.

And South Africans deserve better from them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa