Business Day

Sasol and Anglo pass different wayposts


Anglo American and Sasol reached contrastin­g milestones recently. Sasol announced a new BEE deal to replace the Inzalo scheme, which has not yielded the desired results. Anglo, for so long the bulwark of SA’s economy, turned 100.

No entity has been as intrinsica­lly linked to the South African story as Anglo American. In its heyday, the “corporatio­n” directly influenced every aspect of society. As a direct owner of companies that controlled more than half of the JSE shares at one point, its economic dominance was as enviable as it was tumultuous. To traditiona­l capitalist­s, it represente­d a wonderful example of capitalism’s ability to generate wealth.

To others, its position as a giant in a mining industry built on the back of cheap labour made it a symbol of exploitati­on. Its monopolist­ic nature at the heart of the mining industry meant it had frontline experience of the rise of trade unionism and industrial action against the backdrop of social oppression.

It was perhaps in its political leadership that Anglo distinguis­hed itself from other corporatio­ns. Business leaders rarely take an active part in politics, but Sir Ernest Oppenheime­r and his son took up seats in Parliament and actively advocated the liberalisa­tion of the country’s political system. This was not altogether altruistic as they had an intimate understand­ing that their business would do much better in the absence of internatio­nal economic sanctions.

Anglo’s great gift is that it always seemed to have visionary leadership that was able to read beyond prevailing circumstan­ces and plan ahead.

After 1994, it pioneered the first wave of BEE megadeals. Such deals were largely successful for Anglo and its chosen beneficiar­ies.

One problem with those initial deals, and most BEE deals since then, is the question of whether they are broad-based at all. Individual beneficiar­ies are easy to identify; the few black billionair­es are well known. For broad-based structures — communitie­s, employees — identifyin­g the benefit from BEE deals is more difficult.

This could simply be due to poor evaluation mechanisms. Until such instrument­s exist, the impression one gets about BEE deals is that they have fallen way short of being broad-based. Anglo has had some successes — Mzi Khumalo represents an individual beneficiar­y who apparently didn’t have to do much to get his windfall. Companies such as Exxaro and Royal Bafokeng Platinum are examples of BEE done right.

The Anglo bursary scheme is well known for its effect on society. Anglo subsidiary Kumba built an entire suburb next to its mining operations in Sishen. Most other schemes struggle to exhibit such a balanced suite of broad-based empowermen­t results.

The second issue is how such deals ought to be financed. By their nature, BEE deals require some dilution of the economic wealth of existing shareholde­rs. Most deals are a gamble. In exchange for granting discounted stakes to black shareholde­rs, current shareholde­rs must hope that the long-term trajectory in the value of the business leaves them no worse off.

For Sasol, the key input was the expected growth in the oil price, which never materialis­ed. Sasol now has to start again with the wisdom of hindsight. Whether the shareholde­rs and the intended beneficiar­ies have the patience to wait another decade remains to be seen.

 ??  ?? KHAYA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa