Business Day

Winning is rightly everything when it comes to rugby fans

- MARK KEOHANE Keohane is the founder of www.keo.co.za and a former Springboks communicat­ions manager. Follow him on www.twitter.com/mark_keohane

Critique of the Springboks should not be confused with disrespect of the players, their passion for the game or their on-field effort.

Critique, like adulation, comes with profession­al sport. People invest emotional energy and money to support the Springboks, and it’s because of these people there is such passion about the game in SA.

The South African rugby fan has every right to have an expectatio­n of the Springboks and this fan has every right to want to invest in a team that wins or is expected to win, especially when they are playing in SA.

The Springbok management, individual­ly and as a unit, is understand­ably protective of the players, but they are also far too close to the action to be rational observers.

See Brendan Venter’s emotional defence of his players in such a light.

Venter, who has been lauded for his effect on the Springboks as a technical coaching specialist, took to social media to condemn those who dared criticise the Springboks after the 27-all draw against Australia in Bloemfonte­in.

Venter tweeted that the players deserved respect and not criticism.

He said the Boks were about performanc­e and not just results. He said if fans only wanted results, then they should stop watching.

Venter’s character is passionate and he is an emotional person. He cares deeply about the Springboks, but then so do those supporters he refers to.

The day South Africans stop caring about the result of the Springboks is the day South African rugby dies.

There was every reason for the public to anticipate a win against the Wallabies in Bloemfonte­in. The players told them to expect a win.

The Boks had spoken of redressing the wrongs of Albany’s 57-0 defeat against the All Blacks.

They said they had a turnaround strategy and they created the expectatio­n that the result was nonnegotia­ble.

They did not get the result — and results are the net return by which they get judged every Saturday night.

Respecting player effort does not excuse questionab­le game management and indifferen­t decision-making.

Respectful performanc­es win friends, but results win championsh­ips, titles and ultimately World Cups.

Bloemfonte­in, in this regard, was a failure for the Boks.

Which brings me back to Venter’s social media comments of results being secondary to process.

A result is what the Springboks need on Saturday because the biggest confidence boost the players will get is to beat the All Blacks.

The game cannot just be about being competitiv­e.

Bloemfonte­in’s draw left me with that nothing kind of feeling. Sure the Springboks didn’t lose, but then they didn’t win either.

And when has a draw against Australia in SA ever been celebrated?

The neutral would have enjoyed Saturday’s Test because of the willingnes­s of both teams to be expansive and the desire to score tries.

However, the Springboks appeared to be caught between two worlds — how they have always played and the belief they have to play differentl­y.

Evolving a style of play should not come with the compromise of sacrificin­g traditiona­l strengths.

There is something to be learnt about Eddie Jones’s approach with England.

When Jones succeeded Stuart Lancaster, he told the public, via the media, he did not care how pretty England looked and he wanted the English to find those elements that always made England strong.

He didn’t want England to just be a poor impersonat­ion of New Zealand.

Winning, said Jones, was the only thing that would give England a lift again.

Once the winning habit was there, he said, it would be easier to evolve a playing style.

Test rugby is not franchise rugby and there is not the luxury of building a team over a lengthy period of time.

Bloemfonte­in surprised me because I expected the Boks to suffocate the Australian­s and to rely a lot more on the set piece and field position in terms of using the set piece as an attacking platform.

The end-to-end ball-in-hand stuff looked more Australian than South African, but it suited Australia to be in this type of free-flowing contest.

The Springbok coaching staff has decided on a specific process to develop a style of play, but ultimately every coach, every player and every team is judged on results in profession­al sport.

In Bloemfonte­in, the Springboks did not get the result and to question why is not disrespect­ing anyone or anything. It is quite the opposite.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa