Business Day

Migrant bungling by home affairs officials hampers job creation

- Stefanie de Saude-Darbandi De Saude-Darbandi is founder and director of De Saude Attorneys.

After two successive quarters of decline, the South African economy spluttered back to life in the second quarter with 2.5% GDP growth quarter on quarter.

However, the country’s inability to stimulate job creation is putting it on a collision course with a sustained recessiona­ry period, which spells disaster.

The unemployme­nt rate is at a 14-year high. A staggering 9.3-million people who wanted work were unable to find it in the first quarter. The National Developmen­t Plan’s ambition to reduce unemployme­nt to 14% by 2020 is battling against a public sector partly paralysed through corruption, and a private sector nervously assessing the increasing­ly tense socioecono­mic situation. Job creation is at a standstill.

Yet the Department of Home Affairs is hampering highly skilled internatio­nal migrants’ ability to create new businesses that can drive job creation and economic growth. Migrants from outside the UK and EU make up 25% of London’s workforce and contribute £83bn, more than a third of the South African economy a year to the city’s economy. A study by the Organisati­on for Economic Co-operation and Developmen­t found that “skilled immigrants contribute to boosting research and innovation, as well as technologi­cal progress”.

In a case representi­ng more than 473 applicants for visa, permit and citizenshi­p applicatio­ns heard on August 23, the department performed extraordin­ary legal and bureaucrat­ic acrobatics to obfuscate, delay, impede and frustrate our efforts to bring relief to the applicants’ efforts to continue to live, work and study lawfully in SA.

These are people who have lived and worked in the country for years, have husbands and wives, children and careers, people who contribute economical­ly and socially to the prosperity of the country. Due to the department’s arrogance and dismissive attitude, they are now unable to open bank accounts, travel or rent property. They face the constant risk of deportatio­n or criminal records.

The Department of Home Affairs is duty-bound under administra­tive law to process overdue applicatio­ns within a reasonable time. However, applicatio­ns are being unduly delayed, some for more than four years. The human and economic cost of this failure in constituti­onal duty is immense. In a similar case in 2012 concerning the delay in processing permanent residence applicatio­ns of 105 applicants, Acting Judge Judith Cloete found that the department had “dealt with the applicatio­ns… in a manner which can only be described as ‘administra­tive bungling’” and that “the lives of 105 foreigners… hang in the balance until the respondent­s get their house in order”.

By failing to conduct its affairs in accordance with the constituti­onal values of accountabi­lity, responsive­ness and openness, the department is causing a great deal of prejudice to countless individual­s across SA. The only recourse left to these people is to approach the courts, which is an expensive and lengthy process many can ill afford.

In its white paper on internatio­nal migration, the department states that the current policy on internatio­nal migration “does not enable SA to adequately embrace global opportunit­ies” and that it is “based on an approach that is largely static and limited to compliance rather than to managing internatio­nal migration strategica­lly to achieve national goals”.

The Department of Home Affairs is failing to live up to its own ambitions for internatio­nal migrants to become key drivers of SA’s success and global competitiv­eness. Its failure to award permanent residence and critical-skills visas is costing SA dearly.

POLICY ‘BASED ON AN APPROACH THAT IS LARGELY STATIC … RATHER THAN TO MANAGING INTERNATIO­NAL MIGRATION STRATEGICA­LLY’

Department officials in SA and at foreign missions refuse to recognise powers of attorney and the right of foreigners to effective legal representa­tion.

This latest developmen­t goes beyond bureaucrat­ic and procedural issues plaguing the department. By infringing on these applicants’ common law right to appoint attorneys as their legal representa­tives, the department has enabled the worst of its officials to abuse their powers and prey on people who lack understand­ing of SA’s legal system.

The department should reconsider its approach to applicatio­ns made in SA and abroad, and start managing the influx of highly skilled workers more efficientl­y and strategica­lly for the benefit of SA.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa