Business Day

Charges laid against three global firms

• Regulator acts against KPMG, SAP and McKinsey

- Ann Crotty Contributi­ng Writer

The Companies and Intellectu­al Property Commission (CIPC) has laid criminal charges against audit firm KPMG, consulting firm McKinsey and software giant SAP in a move that is set to cause the three global service providers considerab­le reputation­al damage.

In 2017, the CIPC was instrument­al in Dudu Myeni’s removal as SAA chairwoman after the CIPC’s decision to challenge her for contraveni­ng sections of the Companies Act.

The move by the CIPC, which regulates the Companies Act, is the first criminal charge laid by a regulator against the three companies as a result of their Gupta-related activities.

In the case of KPMG and McKinsey, many of whose wealthy clients have suspended ties until the outcome of various investigat­ions, the criminal charges represent a major blow to hopes of a speedy resolution.

On Tuesday, the CIPC confirmed that after an investigat­ion into the contents of the leaked Gupta e-mails that it launched in July 2017, it decided in November to open a criminal case with the South African Police Service against each of the companies.

In each case, the criminal charge was based on a contravent­ion of section 214(1)(c) of the Companies Act, which related to making false statements, reckless conduct and non-compliance with the act.

KPMG SA’s alleged criminal activity related to the R23m it received from the South African Revenue Service for the controvers­ial report it wrote on the tax agency. The CIPC said that in the report, KPMG SA referred to legal opinions and legal conclusion­s as if they were opinions of KPMG SA.

“This was done despite KPMG SA knowing that providing legal advice and expressing legal opinions was outside the mandate of KPMG SA and outside the profession­al expertise of those working on the report,” said the CIPC. It said KPMG SA knowingly failed to apply its own risk management and quality controls.

KPMG SA communicat­ions manager Nqubeko Sibiya said that the legal team dealing with the issue was not available for comment.

The Independen­t Regulatory Board for Auditors, which is conducting its own investigat­ion into KPMG, welcomed the move by the CIPC.

CEO Bernard Agulhas said the board’s own efforts to strengthen oversight could not root out corruption where it was systemic.

The CIPC said McKinsey contravene­d the Companies Act when it informed Eskom that Trillian was acting as its subcontrac­tor although McKinsey had never entered into a formal subcontrac­t with Trillian. On the basis of this statement by McKinsey, Eskom made a R400m payment directly to Trillian. News of the criminal charge by the South African authoritie­s comes as the US department of justice continues to investigat­e McKinsey’s ties with Eskom.

On Tuesday, Corruption Watch executive director David Lewis said the freezing of assets should be followed by criminal proceeding­s against McKinsey, Trillian and Eskom executives and board members implicated in looting of public resources.

McKinsey spokeswoma­n Bonita Dordel said the firm was not involved in bribery or corruption related to Eskom.

 ?? /The Times ?? Legal opinion: KPMG SA received R23m from the South African Revenue Service for a controvers­ial report. The Companies and Intellectu­al Property Commission said KPMG SA knowingly failed to apply its own risk-management and quality controls.
/The Times Legal opinion: KPMG SA received R23m from the South African Revenue Service for a controvers­ial report. The Companies and Intellectu­al Property Commission said KPMG SA knowingly failed to apply its own risk-management and quality controls.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa