Business Day

Abrahams to ‘apply his mind’ on Zuma

- Genevieve Quintal and Claudi Mailovich

National Director of Public Prosecutio­ns Shaun Abrahams has received the recommenda­tion of the prosecutin­g team that considered whether former president Jacob Zuma should face charges of corruption, money laundering and racketeeri­ng.

National Director of Public Prosecutio­ns Shaun Abrahams has received the recommenda­tion of the prosecutin­g team that considered whether former president Jacob Zuma should be charged with corruption, money laundering and racketeeri­ng.

National Prosecutin­g Authority (NPA) spokesman Luvuyo Mfaku said Abrahams would now “apply his mind”.

“The team will some time next week come and brief him with his deputies and then, after that process is finalised, he will be in a position [to announce his decision],” Mfaku said.

Zuma made fresh representa­tions to the NPA on January 31. The DA has made representa­tions on why he should face the charges.

The charges against Zuma were withdrawn in 2009, but in 2016 the High Court in Pretoria found that this decision was irrational. This ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court of Appeal in 2017.

The NPA has given the Council for the Advancemen­t of the South African Constituti­on (Casac) the assurance that Abrahams will give it two weeks’ notice before he makes any announceme­nt on Zuma’s possible prosecutio­n. If Abrahams decides that Zuma should not face the charges, Casac is set to interdict the decision.

The organisati­on has also asked Abrahams to give an undertakin­g to the Constituti­onal Court that he will not make a decision on prosecutio­n of Zuma before the court has ruled on a confirmati­on applicatio­n before it.

This is in relation to Abrahams’s appointmen­t, which the High Court in Pretoria reviewed and set aside in December 2017.

The NPA, Abrahams, Zuma and former national director of public prosecutio­ns Mxolisi Nxasana were appealing against the high court judgment. However, on Friday President Cyril Ramaphosa withdrew the appeal lodged by Zuma.

IF ABRAHAMS DECIDES ZUMA SHOULD NOT FACE THE CHARGES, CASAC IS SET TO INTERDICT THE DECISION

The state attorney indicated that if Zuma would like to argue on matters affecting him personally “he may do so through his legal representa­tives”. This means costs would come out of Zuma’s pocket.

The Constituti­onal Court will on Wednesday hear the confirmati­on applicatio­n, with both Nxasana and Abrahams resolute they should hold office as NPA boss. Corruption Watch and Freedom Under Law, which brought the applicatio­n together with Casac, argued that Nxasana should be reinstated; Casac argued that neither Abrahams nor Nxasana should hold office.

The DA has called on Ramaphosa to immediatel­y remove Abrahams as national director of public prosecutio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa