Business Day

M&R comes out swinging

• Constructi­on company claims R4.7bn takeover bid undervalue­s it

- Mark Allix Industrial Writer allixm@bdfm.co.za

Murray & Roberts has come out swinging, rejecting big shareholde­r Aton’s takeover offer and saying it is “opportunis­tic” and undervalue­s the constructi­on and engineerin­g group’s prospects.

Murray & Roberts has come out swinging, rejecting shareholde­r Aton’s takeover offer, saying it is “opportunis­tic” and undervalue­s the constructi­on and engineerin­g group’s prospects.

On Monday, Aton made a R4.7bn cash offer for the 70% of ordinary shares in Murray & Roberts it does not hold.

Murray & Roberts on Tuesday outlined three scenarios the German investment group might pursue: to buy up 100% of the constructi­on and engineerin­g group and delist it from the JSE; to buy 50% plus one share to become the majority stakeholde­r; or accrete shares to below a 50% stake.

By late Tuesday, Murray & Roberts had constitute­d an independen­t board following a firm offer letter received from Aton. It has appointed BDO SA Services as independen­t expert.

“The offer is opportunis­tic and made at a time of unpreceden­ted share price weakness as a consequenc­e of low liquidity, declining valuations of [Murray & Roberts’s] legacy peers in the constructi­on sector and halting of the company’s share buy-back programme in 2017,” said Suresh Kana, chairman of the independen­t board.

Murray & Roberts said the offer undervalue­d the company based on its prospects. It also said that the rationale presented by Aton that its bid was good for shareholde­rs, the company, staff and SA’s economy in general was “weak in a number of material respects”.

“Accordingl­y, the independen­t board advises that it will be recommendi­ng to M&R [Murray & Roberts] shareholde­rs to not accept the offer, when made,” Kana said.

Murray & Roberts said a scenario where Aton “accreted” shares but did not delist the company presented risks to the shareholde­rs and also Aton. These included conflicts of interest, strategic misalignme­nt and reduced strategic flexibilit­y.

Group CEO Henry Laas said on Tuesday that Murray & Roberts and Aton’s mining operations overlapped in the US, Canada and Indonesia, among others, and would draw in competitio­n authoritie­s if Aton held a majority stake in the company.

Aton’s R15-a-share offer valued Murray & Roberts at a total of R6.7bn. It already had an irrevocabl­e undertakin­g from fund manager Allan Gray, which owned 10.9% of Murray & Roberts, to accept the offer.

But at the proposed offer price, the independen­t board said the prospects of Aton successful­ly delisting Murray & Roberts were “very low”. Murray & Roberts also said it was not clear how Aton would manage the dilution of its empowermen­t ownership credential­s and the potential effect of this on material contracts and jobs.

Aton said it believed a successful offer would have a positive effect on Murray & Roberts’s stakeholde­rs, including management and staff — and the SA economy in general. It said it was committed to black economic empowermen­t and to positionin­g Murray & Roberts to

THE OFFER IS OPPORTUNIS­TIC AND MADE AT A TIME OF UNPRECEDEN­TED SHARE PRICE WEAKNESS

better withstand volatile and uncertain market conditions.

On Monday, Aton had said its offer was attractive given the uncertain outlook in Murray & Roberts’s key markets. It said the uncertaint­y was reflected in Murray & Roberts’s order book, which had fallen in each of the financial years since 2015.

Aton said that upon completion of the offer, Murray & Roberts’s management and employees would become part of the “service-oriented” investment portfolio of Aton in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa