Business Day

A security net is great if you — can cast it freely

- NEELS BLOM Blom is a flyfisher who likes to write.

Flyfishers know about Parys, Free State. Upstream and down from the bridge over the Vaal River you are free to cast for smallmouth yellowfish and afterwards to find beer and luxuriate over lunch, but just then the Belgian philosophe­r Philippe van Parijs occurs and things change.

Van Parijs is the contempora­ry proponent of a basic income grant, a socialsecu­rity safety net first described by Fabian George Cole, though Van Parijs’s iteration is more about providing capitalism with a way out of its supposed inequality dilemma. Famously, he said the grant should have no strings attached, which roused authoritar­ians everywhere.

Of great importance to flyfishers is Van Parijs’s qualifiers for what constitute­s freedom: in the first instance freedom from authoritar­ians and their institutio­ns proscribin­g species such as trout and, second, freedom from physical constraint­s such as a lack of cash. It means you might be free to fish the Vaal in its polluted state, but if you value your health, perhaps less so, in which case cash will set you free to go fish elsewhere.

But cash is the nub. Let’s say you don’t have it, and then your luck gets worse when you’re in a car accident on the way back from Parys. You survive, but only through expensive physiother­apy will you regain strength enough in your casting arm to go flyfishing again.

So the obvious thing to do is to claim compensati­on from the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to see it right. Right? Well, good luck with that. Authoritar­ians are everywhere, also in Tanzania, and if they have their way with parliament, they’ll see a bill enacted to create a roadaccide­nt benefit scheme (RABS) under which the rehabilita­tion of a flyfisher’s casting form will be deemed a luxury.

Compensati­on under the new scheme would be instalment­s paid to stateselec­ted medical-service providers to restore road accident victims’ ability to work, unless of course you don’t have a job, like 27.5% of South Africans, or you’re older than 65 when you shouldn’t have a job anyway.

For them it is just more bad luck. As for the compensati­on paid on a no-fault basis, it will be capped so victims would all receive the same benefit, making it a kind of socialsecu­rity safety net, but with nanny strings attached.

The fund’s acting CEO, Lindelwa Jabavu, says the problem with the RAF is that it is chronicall­y insolvent, plus it creates what she calls the lotto effect. Instead of the compensati­on helping accident victims get back to work, or helping their dependants survive their loss of income, beneficiar­ies tend to spend their awards frivolousl­y. That is, when they are catapulted from the back of an unroadwort­hy minibus taxi into wealth undreamt, they splurge on luxuries and two weeks later are back at the fund asking for rehabilita­tion money.

Such foolishnes­s, so now the RAF is here to help the nation overcome its lust for luxury. The misery that put the accident victim in the back of the taxi in the first place is neither here nor there. La dolce vita is not your due, even if your taxi fare has contribute­d to the fuel levy that funds the RABS for your benefit, and even if by rights you and only you can tell the difference between a frivolous luxury and a dire necessity.

But let’s not speak of rights when it is administra­tive fiat that makes your decisions for you. Instead, consider the impairment to your freedom to go flyfishing when your casting arm is out of commission and the impairment to your ability to choose how you lead your life when the transport department has bullied its bill into law. The freedom to do the right thing is vanilla, but the right to act foolishly (and suffer the consequenc­es) has the true savour of personal liberty.

If you were free to choose in the sense articulate­d by Van Parijs, drivers would carry insurance against road-accident liabilitie­s, and if your government had any considerat­ion for your wellbeing, it would make it compulsory. And if it valued your freedom, it would allow you to choose how to live, where to fish and what to have for lunch.

YOU MIGHT BE FREE TO FISH THE VAAL, BUT IF YOU VALUE YOUR HEALTH, CASH WILL SET YOU FREE TO GO FISH ELSEWHERE

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa